• ratel@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Aren’t you tired of being labelled?

    Don’t you want to stop dividing people?

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This.

      The ramp up of anti-liberal propaganda around here is concerning. If the enemy is the right, why are we targeting the centrists?

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          They are not. Neo-liberalism is a plague on the moderate liberal centrist voters that we should be appealing to and educating instead of painting them all with the broad-stroke brush of “enemy.” The majority of liberal voters are left-aligned on social issues, and we should be appealing to that.

      • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Liberalism has become unpopular after repeatedly failing to hold back the right, while letting our problems only get worse. There are parts of liberalism we should carry on, but we should still leave it behind. MLs aren’t the answer, as they limit themselves by clinging to the identity more than the praxis. They’re both flawed in how they believe their own bullshit, giving evil a pass while believing things will get better.

        That said, liberals deserve all the shit they’re getting, as their apologetics for parasites cannot be tolerated. Let the wealthy flock to the right. They’ll soon realize that they gave up more power than they thought by endorsing fascism. They needed liberalism more than we do. If we survive fascism burning itself out, we’ll need to fight those fuckers to let us rebuild a functioning society.

        Tldr: liberalism helped the right. We need to let go.

        • Zymi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The only thing I’d temper this with is that MLs are literally not a problem beyond terminally online spaces, particularly the sectarians you mention.

          Like yeah they can suck but I’m much more afraid of Proud Boys and the liberals that enable them.

          Ultimately I agree with you 100 percent it’s just an exhausting thing to always have to be like “yeah sure fuck tankies I guess” when discussing matters of actual life and death.

          • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’m just worried about how they hold back the left to terminally online spaces. We need to get out there more, not waste time cosplaying dead empires! Do that for a larp, but not as your identity.

          • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Economic ideals and political philosophies are a circular ven-diagram. The economy is inherently political, as politics are fundamentally about who gets what, when. The division between economic and social issues is a dangerous myth. Civil rights are economic issues, and stock markets are political.

            Liberalism is the philosophy that incorrectly decouples these two opposing views in your mind. Civil liberties and private ownership; human rights and capitalism. The two will ultimately come into conflict, and one must be sacrificed to maintain the other. Capitalism requires the liberal state, as it becomes feudalism without it. The rules based system of ownership is fundamental to capitalism’s existence.

            • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              53 minutes ago

              Most lefties on here are complaining about laissez-fair liberals(economic, let the free market do its thing. Neoliberals), which are more closely related to libertarians IMO.

              Most people who identify themselves as liberals are simply pro civil rights and freedoms(the economy does it thing as long as it stays the fuck out of civil rights and doesn’t oppressthe lower/middle class. Pro regulation. Monopolies and insider trading are bad). Closely related to social democrats and the labor party

              • Glide@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 minutes ago

                Correct, and this is the real issue I am identifying when I point to this anti-liberal discourse as of late.

                Most of your common liberal voters are not in support of the things we are fighting against. They are poorly educated and mislead, and continuing to paint them as the enemy is making the problem worse and giving the far-right more power. “You’re either with us or against us” mentality isn’t conductive to genuinely solving socio-political problems.

                Fuck libertarians and neo-liberalism. They are not liberals, nor the centrists I was pointing to in my earlier post.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Being comrades with someone with a Soviet ushanka sounds like a great way to have workers’ protests violently suppressed.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It depends on the status of your government. If your country isn’t totally controlled by fascism, yes, those optics will make things harder. You can’t mince words and avoid making your demands bold, but fuck the Soviets. They’re libs in a funny hat at best.

      In the US on the other hand, any type of protest is effectively done with on January 20th. Do not protest next year. We’re legit past that stage; the law is already dead. Work on keeping people safe from the state, because it will only represent the desires of POTUS.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Oh, I didn’t mean as a matter of optics for the public, just as a general “Association with repressive Soviet shitheads is undesirable”

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It is. They’re a cringe cult, but people are looking for answers rn and are vulnerable to cringe cults. I don’t love when people trade MAGA hats for Ushankas, but I think that’ll be a problem in the future.

    • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I second this, coming from a person living in one of the former Soviet Bloc countries, we do NOT want that kind of comradeship again. Nonono. Textbook Socialism (a k.a. not Stalinism) with a basis in secular humanism and friggin’ empathy, yesyesyes!

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It does, unironically. Soviet aesthetics are pretty cool, a shame the Soviets ruined them by being the ones to use it.

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Hey, nobody says ushankas should carry the sins of humans! We can reclaim ushankas as a symbol of empathy and… uuh… general goodness, I guess!

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          interestingly, china propagandized this peacetime soldier who died in an accident, lei fang, into this model citizen of kindness and selflessness, and thus the chinese call the hat the “lei feng hat” after propaganda depictions. whether that (and the fact that northeasterners usually wear the hat regardless of politics to combat cold) means it has shed communist symbolism is up to you

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    aren’t you tired of being a liberal?

    don’t you want to be a liberal who doesn’t understand the point of politics?

    free your mind from pesky knowledge and political context, all it does is get in the way of forming autocratic groups and exploiting the people around you!