I’ve seen some videos on them. They look pretty nice but I worry about how they hold up and the build quality, as I would any relatively unestablished brand.

Holy shit.

men aren’t inherently bad… Etc.

Looks like you understand the intent of the original tweet.

Not all men - but some men - and we (other men) need to start calling our the Tater-tots and the like

I don’t think that the original tweet is really getting at stereotypes, but rather pointing out how frustrating it must be to not know who’s going to be a scumbag and who is not.

It’s not all men, most certainly, yet chauvinism counties to be (an increasing problem). One of the (very make dominated) places I worked had to put up signs that read looking versus leering: know the difference. I’m male, and I most certainly get the frustration after hearing more than a few first hand accounts about how women are routinely mistreated.

That would be Wytch Hazel

I’m a master baiter

Rats.

Dunno about you, but I’m bopping the bishop right now bb.

Bruh was a deer in his past life

I’ve told mine to be really direct; mean spirited almost, and it helps. It still precedes a bunch of stuff with ‘here is the straight up answer’ but it’s less icky about boot licking.

Yeuff. That’s a rabbithole and a half, I imagine. I don’t know much about it, but IIRC leading theories are related to the plague or a bunch of migration i think

I’m not an american, thankfully

The dust bowl stretched as far north as Palliser’s triangle.

I’ve dug pits near Selkirk MB, and average topsoil depth in that area is 20 cm, and the soils are regosolic (meaning it’s topsoil over top of regolith, rather than having a transitional horizon) in most farmers fields.

Go off into the bush 200 m away, and the soil there, that had the exact same pedogenic conditions has the 60 cm of Ah horizon (black topsoil), super strong structure, a fully developed B horizon (that transition horizon I mentioned earlier) and then the C (regolith).

This is all because the area lost a foot of topsoil during the 30s, and what was left was poorly managed - conventional tillage for decades - which has caused plow erosion of the B horizon and admixing of the poorer subsoil horizons into the A horizon.

This erosion of the B happens because in a conventional tillage system, you lose a few mm of soil each year off the top, yet your plow depth settings don’t change because you still need that 30 cm or whatever it is to grow your crops.

Have an archived link, you uncultured swine

https://archive.is/20250418172704/https://www.ft.com/content/a6ad1627-3481-455e-ade8-65c595c1d3e5

We would still have lobbyists telling politicians that trains are a terrible idea

Was the crowbar enough leverage to get the job done? You could have used ratchet boomers maybe.

i dareeee you tooo shifty looks - threatening her with a good time

I disagree with you, and @relianceschool@slrpnk.net - respectfully.

I’m not trying to detract from AI’s issues, or insist that we can only address one issue at a time. However, if I was given $100 Million to address these issues, I’d be investing 99 millon into dealing with water, land, and mining related issues, as those can have immediate effects. Emissions are such a hard one to address, since it requires buy in from literally everyone (look how hard that was with COVID, and people were dying right there and then due to it). Regulating and reducing AI emissions seems a lower priorty to me compared to things like better O&G regulation which are likely to have larger impacts on overall emssions.

They don’t say how big the spill was