• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The verification system is not remotely accurate. It probably does more harm than good. Valve should have made it crowdsourced like protondb because they’re obviously unable to keep up, and I don’t know why they thought they would be.

    Further, they failed to establish any concrete guidelines on frame rate for their ratings.

    Shit, they could have crowdsourced the data from user devices.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Valve is going for a console experience, and that means the games just work. Every time, no matter what, with no tinkering.

      Obviously, with PC gaming (on Linux no less), that is a nearly insurmountable challenge.

      I think the check mark is their attempt at that, and that’s why it doesn’t match 1:1 with ProtonDB.

      Even the most minimal amount of “tinkering,” or “incompatibility,” like having to change the resolution the first time you open the game, or the game doesn’t have an option for the Deck’s resolution (meaning small black bars at the top and bottom. Big deal), will stop it from getting approved as “fully compatible”

      Valve’s approval is just not the same thing as ProtonDB, they have two different purposes

    • shrodes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      They could (and probably should) just partner up with ProtonDB and just bring in badges like the Decky plugin does. That also has the added bonus of getting some recommended tweaks or settings from other users really easily.