Day 24: Crossed Wires

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • You can send code in code blocks by using three backticks, the code, and then three backticks or use something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ if you prefer sending it through a URL

FAQ

  • gedhrel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Haskell bits and pieces

    The nice thing about Haskell’s laziness (assuming you use Data.Map rather than Data.Map.Strict) is that the laziness can do a ton of the work for you - you might’ve spotted a few Haskell solutions in earlier days’ threads that use this kind of trick (eg for tabling/memoisation). Here’s my evaluation function:

    eval l =
      let
        v = l & Map.map (\case
                           Const x -> x
                           And a b -> v Map.! a && v Map.! b
                           Or a b  -> v Map.! a || v Map.! b
                           Xor a b -> v Map.! a /= v Map.! b)
      in v
    

    For part 2, we know what the graph should look like (it’s just a binary adder); I think this is a maximal common subgraph problem, but I’m still reading around that at the mo. I’d love to know if there’s a trick to this.

      • gedhrel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I remember when I saw this for the first time. It’s astonishing how powerful lazy evaluation can be at times.