Advocates say it is discrimination and are arguing for “insurance fairness” on the grounds that people who have joints surgically replaced typically don’t face the same kinds of coverage challenges.
That’s not how it works. The CEO is so wealthy that the insurance companies treat them for free because of all the business they bring in from enrolling their workers.
We don’t hear stories about the soft privileges of being in a position of power very often but they tend to be immense. We’re just not in the club so we would never know.
I wonder if someone cut off the CEO’s limbs, would the medical necessity of prosthetic limbs would be questioned?
You know, maybe we should force healthcare CEOs to be insured with the lowest tier of their own insurance.
Like some kind of new saw movie lol
deleted by creator
Line must go up. They probably see themselves as brave by continuing to follow Friedman’s shareholder logic in the face of these events.
That’s not how it works. The CEO is so wealthy that the insurance companies treat them for free because of all the business they bring in from enrolling their workers.
We don’t hear stories about the soft privileges of being in a position of power very often but they tend to be immense. We’re just not in the club so we would never know.