Nemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agoGoogle begins requiring JavaScript for Google Searchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up1422arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipprivacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1419arrow-down1external-linkGoogle begins requiring JavaScript for Google Searchtechcrunch.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square142fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipprivacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comprivacy@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·12 days ago Your hamster analogy falls apart here because it only describes an exception, not a rule. It’s not my analogy.
minus-squarejohn89@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 days agoRight… if you’re going to split that hair then you’re just proving my point.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 days agoI’m not splitting a hair, I’m just telling you I don’t feel that strongly about it because I’m not the one who made it. I’d never heard it before.
minus-squarejohn89@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 days ago I feel bad for anyone who internalizes it after hearing it from someone else.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 days agoIt doesn’t have to be the whole explanation. It’s not like you get a singular sentence to talk to someone lol.
minus-squarejohn89@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 days agoNo, even adding it takes away from the explanation for the reasons I mentioned.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 days ago“It’s like ham and hamster. Totally unrelated. But that’s just JavaScript, other BlahScripts are related. There was this crazy advertising push for Java back in the '90s that they took advantage of for name recognition.”
It’s not my analogy.
Right… if you’re going to split that hair then you’re just proving my point.
I’m not splitting a hair, I’m just telling you I don’t feel that strongly about it because I’m not the one who made it. I’d never heard it before.
It doesn’t have to be the whole explanation. It’s not like you get a singular sentence to talk to someone lol.
No, even adding it takes away from the explanation for the reasons I mentioned.
“It’s like ham and hamster. Totally unrelated. But that’s just JavaScript, other BlahScripts are related. There was this crazy advertising push for Java back in the '90s that they took advantage of for name recognition.”