• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you want to argue technicalities (and you REALLY should at least examine those before making legally binding edicts reinterpreting reality), it actually makes every American nongender.

    It specifies “at conception”, at which point no sexual characteristics have developed.

    • 1D10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah they define female as member of species with largest sex cell but also state the sex person is at conception is their sex, therefore we are all sexless.

  • LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty sure according to current science, the sex is “undifferentiated” until a certain point in development. That means Trump wrote it so no one is female, lol.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It rather depends on how you’re defining sex. And I’m not joking, the article gives good examples on when it is ambiguous.

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for pointing that out. When I first checked the link, I must have been tired as I missed that there was an article beyond the image and headline somehow. (Normally my habit would have been to check if the topic was covered, since headlines can be misleading. Case in point, in this case they were going for humour more than accuracy there, but the article indeed has examples.)

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I missed that there was an article beyond the image and headline somehow.

          This is 100% understandable… Especially on a phone these days it’s getting crazy hard to read articles.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, it shows that the average right winger was fast asleep in school, especially during science and history classes.

    • Kingofthezyx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s because anyone with a basic understanding of human biology knows sex is a biological concept that is quite fluid - and gender has an incredibly soft scientific basis if any at all, within social contexts. If he had people who actually understood science helping his write this, they would only be explaining the ways it’s wrong.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m trying to wrap my head around how executive orders work. I’m not American.

    Can someone explain what’s the legal process compared to a bill for example?

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A policy applied to federal agencies on the whims of the executive/administration (president+staff). (FBI, CIA, DHS, ICE, TSA, HHS, FDA, so forth…)

      Does not impact state law, judicials, or enforcement agencies. Though many of these do take their lead from federal guidelines to some degree, especially at the police and sheriff level.

      This will be sued over constitutionality in the courts

      Stacked courts will probably claim it’s constitutional

      Up to Congress to specifically and independently say it’s unconstitutional. This Congress will probably not do that

      IF there’s another election, and the term limit is still adhered to, the next administration may chose to revoke it or alter it assuming they have differing policies.

      Rinse and repeat.

      [Edits: clarification and structure]

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there a process to make them official? Like is there a vote on them by Congress or something? Or are they automatically applied?

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are applied with effect based on how they’re written. They are “Official” but they can’t change the writing of the constitution. Another administration can immediately revoke them as he has with many of biden’s. The courts can only change how the constitution is interpreted. Congress needs to pass an amendment to change the constitution.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re not laws… The president is the head of the “executive branch” which has a number of federal departments that execute the laws passed by the legislature.

      Executive orders are basically “memos” from the president that direct those departments on how to operate since the laws don’t typically get into too much detail about the specifics.

      These orders apply only to federal offices, he has no authority over private business or state governments without passing a law.