TL;DR: the meat industry’s misleading messaging campaign + lobbying

  • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Think of it in terms of inputs and outputs. This is drastically simplified with rounded numbers, but gets the point across.

    I can take 1 acre of land, add seed, and 500,000 gallons of water. These are my inputs. From that, I get an output of 2000 pounds of grain. I could take that output and eat it myself. Or I could decide I want to grow meat.

    If I grow meat, I need another 1 acre of land, another 100,000 gallons of water, and at least half of that 2000 pounds of grain from my first acre. Now I can grow a cow.

    It is more efficient in terms of resource utilization to go directly from plant to human, instead of going from plant to animal to human.

    • Schedar@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, that is the major reason I try to choose plant based options. I was just thrown by @Hirom saying about chicken being better for the environment, I’m assume they meant it’s better than beef (which it is) but not as good as the plant-based versions.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, I meant chicken has less impact on the environment than beef. And chicken burger as an alternative to beef burger.