• NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    To be fair, I do think it’s a bit different than a coup. If strong evidence comes out that the election was tampered with (which I could believe) then I’d call it a coup, but as it stands right now, it’s more like the American people voted to try a dictatorship political system out

    Coup implies hostile takeover but Musk & Co. were just handed the reins to the US government

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      The executive branch is taking power from the legislative and judicial branch. By taking the power of the purse and by ignoring judicial orders.

      The executive branch is executing a coup. Like by definition. No one voted to throw out the constitution. We voted for a president that had checks and balances. Now that they are in, they are ignoring the checks and consolidating power.

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 年前

        Right, yeah I can agree when it’s put that way. It’s definitely an interesting situation to say the least

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Oh, we’re playing the literalist game. I didn’t realize. Yes, if a coup requires a violent overthrow, then that may not have happened.

      I would think that modern coup definition could be extended to include tricking a large number of people through media brainwashing. I guess it depends on your minimum definition of violence. Is brain washing a violent act?