Why YSK: I’ve been seeing an increasing number of phone photos shared online in 9:16, 9:21 or similarly tall aspect ratios, often with parts of the subject cut off. I’ve asked a few people why they cropped their images that way, and none of them knew they were cropped.

    • Zak@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody is telling you what to like, just how your phone camera functions.

      Now if we’re doing photo critique, I might tell you a 9:16 portriat orientation photo of your cat with half its ear cropped out on the side but a whole bunch of the floor included in the foreground looks poorly composed, but cropping to 16:9 in some other context might exclude some uninteresting clutter and improve the photo.

      • itadakimasu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get it and I’ve always known. I just prefer 16:9 photos because… Well, my screen and monitors, and TV are 16:9 so why not take photos that (by default) fill the screens?

        Nothing more annoying than showing an album to friends over Chromecast on your TV and the photos don’t fill the screen.

        • Zak@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If that’s your preference, then that’s what you should do.

          I’m seeing an increasing diversity in screen aspect ratios lately though, so it might be worth considering whether that’s the aspect ratio you want to use for a photo you’ll care about longer than your current display devices. If you shoot it uncropped, you can always create cropped copies later.

          WRT diversity, my current laptop is 16:9. My next one will probably be 3:2. My main external display is 16:10, and the secondary is 9:16. My phone is 19.5:9. Media rarely fills the screen for me.

          • borebore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            One issue with shooting uncropped is that the composition will most likely take advantage of the aspect ratio you are using and not necessarily crop well. Composing the shot in the aspect ratio that you intend to display it is actually a better technique unless you are very skilled and able to imagine how you’re going to crop it in the future.

        • gk99@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nothing more annoying than showing an album to friends over Chromecast on your TV and the photos don’t fill the screen.

          But you can still just crop it after taking the picture? 4:3 would just give you more freedom of where the cut is made for photos that might not be lined up perfectly when taken in 16:9.

  • borebore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I did some testing on my phone, Samsung S22, and it looks like 1:1 uses the most of the sensor. Any other aspect ratio was zooming in. This is particularly upsetting to me since I was using the “full” setting which cropped the most but I thought I was using the most of the sensor.

    • bitfortress2@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Interesting. I have a Samsung A3 and both 1:1 and ‘Full’ crop, 3:4 is the one that doesn’t. Luckily I think 3:4 is the default on the camera because I don’t remember changing it. The safest thing is probably to just look up your phones specs tbh.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is true, and good to know but with caveats. If you take the picture in 16:9 mode then yes you’re only using part of the sensor (or likely the whole sensor but only part of the image is being processed and stored), but you would also be using your phone’s display to properly frame and take the picture how you want to. A good picture is not just the technical aspect of using the sensor.

    The outcome when someone crops a 4:3 image after taking it to make it 16:9 etc depends on how the orignal image was framed and how good the skills are of the person cropping it. You may get more information if you take the picture in 4:3 mode but then you may find it much harder to convert it to a format you like (for example, a format that would fill the display when viewed on a phone, a TV or a computer display) due to how you framed the original photo. I’d argue it’s better to take the photo in the format you want to consume it in if you’re using a phone. If you have an actual dedicated camera, then get a camera that works best in the format you want to use.

    • Zak@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, pre-cropping is a valid technique, best done intentionally.

      get a camera that works best in the format you want to use

      Dedicated cameras intended for photography (rather than videography) almost exclusively come in either 4:3 or 3:2. Video cameras occasionally use 16:9, or even weirder ratios.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m lucky that my phone (Realme x3) defaults to the 16:9 but has a 64mp option that switches to 4:3 with one tap. Best of both worlds.

  • barnsbauer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That depends on the phone. I remember some old Samsung flagships using a native 16:9 sensors. That was over at least half a decade ago though. Another device with such a setup I remember would be the Nokia 8 Sirocco.

    And, the now extinct Windows phones had atypical arrangement where neither aspect ratios would result in the full usage of the sensor, though 4:3 got closer. The Sony Xperia 1 V has multi-aspect ratios too, afaik, where you’d gain some horizontal FOV at the expense of the same vertically when switching from 4.3:3 to 16:9 or longer.

    For the vast majority of the phones and their users out there though, I agree with you. I’ve seen way too many people go with 18-21:9 pictures, probably thinking they’re capturing more of the scene as they see that aspect ratio fill up their screen.

    • Zak@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also true, though phones with multiple cameras often combine the UI for that cropping with switching cameras rather than having an explicit control to select a camera.

    • specialneedz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When “zooming” in the view finder the phone can adjust exposure and processing to what’s just in the frame, so it’s not quite the same as cropping in after the shot. So you might end up with a better shot with zooming first. Resolution wise it’s the same though.

    • CodyCannoli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, this one’s not as accurate anymore, most phones have digital enhancement that improves the photo when you zoom in. This digital enhancement is not done if your subject is really small in the photo. For stuff thats actually far away zooming is better, if you’re just framing a shot then yeah crop it later.

  • Postcard64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This. I always make sure to check the maximum aspect ratio of cameras I use. No point in wasting pixels and field of view.