Summary

The IRS anticipates a $500 billion revenue loss as taxpayers increasingly skip filings following cuts from Elon Musk under Trump.

The IRS, set to downsize by 20% by May 15, has seen increased online chatter about avoiding taxes, with individuals betting auditors won’t scrutinize accounts.

Experts warned that workforce reductions could cripple the agency’s efficiency.

Treasury officials predict a 10% drop in tax receipts compared to 2024.

Former IRS commissioners have criticized the cuts, warning of dysfunction and reduced collection capacity.

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, but you CAN have taxation without funding the military. You’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

    I don’t think taxation is the only way to do this, but you do need some kind of process for ensuring common social services and infrastructure exist and are maintained. Taxation is what we have now. How would you support those services without it?

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you absolutely must have taxation, then have state taxation. Because I don’t see the state of Texas declaring war on Pakistan.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        How would you fund federal services?

        Seems to me the problem isn’t taxation, it’s the process for deciding how that government spending is distributed…

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can’t fix that problem. The fact that there is a big pile of money there means that greedy people will attempt to get their hands on it. No matter what. So the only way to fix that is to not have the big pile of money sitting there to begin with.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            So… you think that: a) you can’t change the way government spends money, but b) you can change the way government receives money?

            That’s an interesting world view.

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                Get off the internet, it was started because of government funding. Don’t drive on roads, government funding. Don’t use gas or a car, or helmets or drink water, or take any medicine. You can’t wear clothes you didn’t make yourself, don’t live in a house that was built to code. Forget gfic outlets. Electronics that meet safety regs? Get rid of them. You better not have an up to date Electrical box either. Food safety? More government overreach funded by taxes. Those wastages.