turnip@sh.itjust.works to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoThe Company Has Reported Strong Financial Performancesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.13Karrow-down1imageThe Company Has Reported Strong Financial Performancesh.itjust.worksturnip@sh.itjust.works to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square33linkfedilink
minus-squareFonzie!@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·2 days agoI might be mistaken but 60k > 12 thousand, no? Or are you taking about 60k per year, suddenly?
minus-squarefoggy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·edit-22 days agoYes, per year. They started at 50% of my low end.
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 days agoHe meant 10-12k per month. 60k is less than 5k per month.
minus-squareFonzie!@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoHe said 10-12k per month, and then only said 60k but not per when. I was trying to figure out if they forgot to add per year or if they mistyped the last number.
minus-squaremmddmm@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoAlso, per month numbers usually are net-value, and per year numbers usually are raw-value. There may be even a 100% increase from the first to the later.
I might be mistaken but 60k > 12 thousand, no?
Or are you taking about 60k per year, suddenly?
Yes, per year. They started at 50% of my low end.
He meant 10-12k per month. 60k is less than 5k per month.
He said 10-12k per month, and then only said 60k but not per when. I was trying to figure out if they forgot to add per year or if they mistyped the last number.
Also, per month numbers usually are net-value, and per year numbers usually are raw-value.
There may be even a 100% increase from the first to the later.