Fair, I still have a lot of learning to do about Korea. I’m familiar with the basics of Japanese Imperialism, US intervention post-World War II, and then the general outline of the Korean War (including the devastation it brought on the Korean people) but beyond that I’m not very well-versed. It’s an area I’d like to study further.
Rhetorically and factually trounce, then? Destroy, in the marketplace of ideas? What term would you prefer to describe your use as a springboard for me to bounce pro-Marxist ideas off of?
Feel free to keep letting me ratio you then 👍
Also, pretty sure you’re referring to me talking about the USSR, not the DPRK, so you can’t even get your talking points straight.
They’re the same picture.
Fair, I still have a lot of learning to do about Korea. I’m familiar with the basics of Japanese Imperialism, US intervention post-World War II, and then the general outline of the Korean War (including the devastation it brought on the Korean people) but beyond that I’m not very well-versed. It’s an area I’d like to study further.
https://archive.org/details/ellen-bruno-and-jacques-hersh-socialist-korea-a-case-study-in-the-strategy-of-ec
Thanks, comrade!
Its 2025. Language has evolved further than ‘ratio’
Rhetorically and factually trounce, then? Destroy, in the marketplace of ideas? What term would you prefer to describe your use as a springboard for me to bounce pro-Marxist ideas off of?