• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    No shit.

    The fact that is news and not inherently understood just tells you how uninformed people are in order to sell idiots another subscription.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why would somebody intuitively know that a newer, presumably improved, model would hallucinate more? Because there’s no fundamental reason a stronger model should have worse hallucination. In that regard, I think the news story is valuable - not everyone uses ChatGPT.

      Or are you suggesting that active users should know? I guess that makes more sense.

      • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There is definitely reason a larger model would have worse hallucinations. Why do you say not? It’s a fundamental problem with data scaling in these architectures

      • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve never used ChatGPT and really have no interest in it whatsoever.

        How about I just do some LSD. Guaranteed my hallucinations will surpass ChatGPT’s in spectacular fashion.