• bjorney@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    The “Paid app” he is referring to is wine for anyone too lazy to read the article

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      CrossOver actually. Which is a paid packaging for wine, with a per-program configuration, kinda like Bottles…but paid. There’s a load of quotes directly from the CrossOver parent company CEO…

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      for anyone too lazy to read the article

      Um, well considering the paid app mentioned in the article is CrossOver not wine, ig that includes you too lol (though, CrossOver does contribute back to Wine, still can’t trust them long term because profit…)

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes, it was hyperbole, but saying “CodeWeavers does contribute back” is really downplaying it, many, if not most of the wine development is done by CodeWeavers employees (including Alexandre Julliard). Mac users buying crossover was pretty much the main economic driver turning the gears of wine for the 10-15 years before Valve started sponsoring it as well.

        still can’t trust them long term because profit

        The company is an employee owned trust (co-op) if that lessens the blow

      • ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have never understood this attitude in the open source community. You’ll mouth off all day about how profit is bad, but so many projects can only survive with the backing of invested companies. You’re chasing the perfect at the expense of the good. Would Wine even exist today without CrossOver? I think no.