Trump wannabe losing electon because he’s a Trump wannabe and Canadians don’t want to elect a Trump wannabe says stupid Trumpist shit that isn’t going to help his chances because he’s a Trump wannabe try hard.

https://youtu.be/R59JmC0u63I

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    He already said he wants to use the notwithstanding clause to forego due process.

    Sure, it’s murderers or whatever now, but when have governments ever stopped there? And why can’t our justice system deal with this?

    • ferretfacefrankburns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      He said he would only apply it to “multiple murderers” , then he’ll define abortion as murder to apply this to anybody providing abortion services in Canada or supporting abortion. They aren’t even clever with their evil plans, it’s more transparent than glass.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 hours ago

        They aren’t even clever with their evil plans, it’s more transparent than glass.

        Trump was pretty clear what he would do, and still people voted for him. Or failed to vote against him.

    • immutable@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every suspension of due process seems to have the same contours.

      Pick a person that you can tell your followers is “obviously bad.”

      Now, because they are so obviously bad it seems like it should be no bother at all to go prove that to a court. But your followers didn’t get into this cult for the critical thinking skills workshops.

      And now you’ve got your due process loophole, everything is all nice and legalish. The followers will never find themselves caught in that loophole, no sir, they aren’t “obviously bad.” Oh a follower of the cult just got caught in the loophole, well they must have not been a real follower, they are retroactively obviously bad.

      What do you mean I’m obvious bad, no I’m not?! I can prove I’m not bad, I have evidence that I said the right things, I thought the right thoughts, I hated the right people!!! When’s my day in court, I can’t believe the things they are saying about me!!!

      What do you mean get on the plane to CECOT?! I’m not a terrorist, I’m not in MS13, this is preposterous. You are only supposed to use this on people who are obviously bad…