• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, these court records of “someone” saying he is? Or the court records that had a stay of deportation?

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except the us isn’t at war, so he shouldn’t have been deported. Trump’s government had no right to deport him based on the stay of deportation, sooooo he shouldn’t have been deported for being a “gang” member because the stay of deportation wouldn’t have happened if he was in ms13.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except they ruled that they are at war with MS13, so he could lawfully be deported along with all the others.

              Whoa! Congress declared a state of war?

              Already explained - the illegal alien act

              Which, again, not at war.

              Incorrect. The stay really only happened because he is MS13 - it was given precisely because they concluded that MS13’s rival gang would seek him out and harm him if he was deported.

              Funny that, i thought ms13 were super dangerous, why would they not only stop him from being deported, but also let him be free,

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Alien Enemies Act. Google it.

                  Yes, not at war, nor is there an invasion

                  Alien Enemies Act. Google it.

                  Yes again, not at war, nor is there an invasion

                  Because activist judges

                  Yes activist judges, like the ones who wanted him deported? Or are they only activist judges when it goes against your views?