• wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree with what you’re saying, that the attack didn’t require any data breach to take place, but I do have one slightly pedantic point.

        Codeberg being non-profit does not make the employees “volunteers”. They are normal employees and take a wage like working for any other company. What’s different is that any excess revenue over costs must be used to continue the company’s objectives and is not able to be taken by the company owners as profit.

    • Oinks@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      How was it an obvious data breach? The attack was done via Codebergs notification system. It’s no different from the notification you got from me writing this comment.

    • priapus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      How is that an obvious databreach? It was just bot spam, something every single public site has had issues with.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      That spam was a troll who found a loophole in the notification system. It was obviously not a data breach. That’s clear to anyone who’s worked with software databases or web servers.