• cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    that’s what the word means

    “You can’t use X word like that because [It’s made up|That’s not what it means|It means something else]” argument is always incredibly weak.

    At its very core, language is dynamic, words come, go and change all the time. It’s how it works. Languages that don’t change, die.

    On top of that, words can have multiple meanings that are dependent on context.

    • Mesophar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Wouldn’t that also apply to calling them subs? Like, maybe it’s technically a community and not a sub-[item], but everyone knows what is meant by it.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        We as a group stopped using ‘subs’ to distance ourselves from reddit. Had they not been as shitty as they were, we might still be using their terminology

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          Yeah, but reclaiming “sub” would just be an example of language being dynamic. Unless someone is calling the communities “subreddits” I don’t think there should be this divisive issue about it.

          Use sub if you want, or not if you dislike the term.

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Speak for yourself, I’m not so obsessed with reddit that i need to make up new words just to price I’m not obsessed with reddit.