fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoCursedmander.xyzimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1705arrow-down15
arrow-up1700arrow-down1imageCursedmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square87linkfedilink
minus-squarewise_pancake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 month agoIs this a hard limit we’ve proven or can we still keep trying?
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·1 month agoWe actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
minus-squareglimse@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·1 month agoFiguring out 1-4 must have been sooo tough
minus-squarerockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·1 month agoIt’s the best we’ve found so far
Is this a hard limit we’ve proven or can we still keep trying?
We actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
Figuring out 1-4 must have been sooo tough
It’s the best we’ve found so far