No there was proof then too, just much less than after. I wouldn’t have believed it was a thing based on a single claim without anything further either (which is not the same as denial). But same goes for all genocides, real or made up. That’s just the nature of waiting for proof for claims.
But in this case a better comparison would be a single murder during the holocaust, since we know widespread killing is happening
The Nazis were far more discrete in their genocide than the Israelis. The amount of evidence for atrocities during the Holocaust is immensely lower. This is why Holocaust denialists exist and trolls who keep disputing the 6 million. Because it relies on families reporting one of their loved ones as killed without checks.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else. When you read a testimony about Sudan do you go “Is there any evidence those RSF soldiers really did that?”
Your comparison would make more sense if I was asking for proof of people being killed in Palestine at all instead of for this specific killing. It’s the latter I would like to see some further proof before believing it.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else
Of asking for proof before I trust something happened? I apply that to pretty much anything of consequence lol. Palestine is not exempt from it or special in it.
Then it’s a no for me dawg
Alright good luck denying the Holocaust as well.
What? Why would they?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyY9zQJYZ4&t=76s
Holocaust has some very well documented proof my dude
Not while it was happening
No there was proof then too, just much less than after. I wouldn’t have believed it was a thing based on a single claim without anything further either (which is not the same as denial). But same goes for all genocides, real or made up. That’s just the nature of waiting for proof for claims.
But in this case a better comparison would be a single murder during the holocaust, since we know widespread killing is happening
The Nazis were far more discrete in their genocide than the Israelis. The amount of evidence for atrocities during the Holocaust is immensely lower. This is why Holocaust denialists exist and trolls who keep disputing the 6 million. Because it relies on families reporting one of their loved ones as killed without checks.
You apply a standard to Gaza which you apply absolutely nowhere else. When you read a testimony about Sudan do you go “Is there any evidence those RSF soldiers really did that?”
Here is a great video comparing evidence for the Gaza genocide to the Holocaust https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWyY9zQJYZ4&t=76s
Your comparison would make more sense if I was asking for proof of people being killed in Palestine at all instead of for this specific killing. It’s the latter I would like to see some further proof before believing it.
Of asking for proof before I trust something happened? I apply that to pretty much anything of consequence lol. Palestine is not exempt from it or special in it.
Click the video and find out that you apply immense double standards.