Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said in rejecting calls for a ban on trans competitors.

  • GreenMouse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

    An unfair competition… in a damn chess game?! WHAT?!

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Because back in the day when blatant sexism was the norm, women were excluded. Women-only tournaments were an attempt to correct that.

      In a perfect world, everybody would play in the same tournaments and all genders would feel equally welcome to them, but that’s not the world we live in.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      There are open tournaments and women’s tournaments. The open tournaments are for anyone. Women have competed in them but at the top level it is somewhat rare.

      The women’s tournaments are intended to provide an environment that encourages more women to play chess. There’s considerable sexism among men (not only in the chess world, hah) which is not always very welcoming.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    Why should it prompt backlash? Did they celebrate the win by knocking over their opponent’s king with their cock?

    These pearl clutchers make me want to force said pearls down their throat until they shit out every single bead or I can grab one end of the necklace and rip it out like a fucking BeyBlade!

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 days ago

    Internationally, the World Chess Federation imposed a temporary ban in 2023, preventing trans women from women’s tournaments pending further review — a rule Germany opposes, pointing out that a trans woman had already claimed a national women’s title in the early 2000s, Apollo News reports.

    I think this just completely took effect and was not temporary.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_people_in_chess
    https://www.bbc.com/sport/67127168

    The whole thing is a shitshow, because if you are MTF , FIDE does not think you are a woman, thus can’t have women’s titles, but also, if you’re FTM , you are ALSO not a woman, so you can’t keep your women’s titles (Womens’ grandmaster, Womens’ International Master,etc).

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    The German Chess Federation has rejected any ban

    meh.

    if they really cared, there would not be any official ‘gendered’ tournaments. but there are, because they want that for some reason.

    • AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Gendered chess tournaments make a certain amount of sense. The main issues are that women are less likely to play chess due to societal and cultural factors and without their own division would have even more societal and cultural roadblocks to joining the game. This isn’t touching on how getting certain titles requires winning specific events that would prove even more difficult for those same reasons.

      Basically without gendered tournaments there would be even less women in chess and it would be even more of a “boys club” than it already is.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        It’s also why the anti-trans argument makes absolutely no sense in chess. Like, in sports there’s some room for nuance because cis men do have a huge advantage in most sports of cis women, and depending on the sport and the stage of transition, that can carry forward to trans women. It’s fucking hard to have that nuanced conversation because 95% of the time it gets drowned out by transphobes, but there’s still something to talk about.

        But in chess? Nobody is arguing there’s any inherent biological advantage. The only reason for gendered tournaments is to create a safer space for non-men to compete in a male-dominated pastime. The only argument for excluding trans women from the Women’s category in chess is transphobia. It’s a real “mask off” moment for all the TERFs claiming it’s about “integrity in sport” (Jesus fuck, writing that out made me realise how similar this all is to gamergate and the birth of the alt right).

        A lot of tournaments in HEMA (historical European martial arts—think fencing, but with bigger, older styles of swords than what they use at the Olympics) around where I lived have started using an “Underrepresented Genders” (URG) category alongside the Open category, instead of Women’s. It’s functionally not much different from having a Women’s category that also accepts trans people (important possible difference: it accepts trans men as well as trans women, and enbies), but the name helps make it clearer. I quite like that as a concept.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          Nobody was ever arguing there was a biological advantage… As the comment you replied to pointed out, it’s about socialization. Since that mostly happens as children, those who transition as teens have already experienced much of that.

          • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            15 days ago

            How does a trans-woman’s socialization compromise competitive integrity? That’s an entirely internal problem, and it doesn’t affect any other competitors. This is really just grabbing for any excuse to be transphobic.

            • verdigris@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 days ago

              I hypothetically agree, but note that you’re basically arguing for trans women to compete with men. Just in this scenario bio women also have to. And classically this results in men dominating and women being discouraged from even joining due to factors discussed above.

      • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        I mean, easy fix there right? Just have a women’s tournament and an everybody tournament. Women can then choose which to enter.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        The system only functions the way it does because the people prop it up. Any system.

        • AlataOrange@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          So instead of having a welcoming space for a historically and actively marginalized group while allowing them to still complete in every other tournament we should just what? Close women’s divisions, revoke all their titles, and tell them to play “real chess” instead?

          Like getting rid of women’s tournaments is only a bad thing that would make the game stagnant even further to being the “boys club” game a lot of people already think it is when chess should be for everybody.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            I’m not fond of self-marginalizing. So maybe some of us are uncomfortable. Some men will be, too. Maybe individuals are capable of self-regulating if empowered to do that. I’m sure some chuds will throw a tantrum. Block and parry, so to speak.

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Officially there’s women’s and open tournaments. There isn’t anything stopping the top female player, Hou Yifan from going to a tourney and potentially playing the top (general and specifically male) player Magnus Carlsen.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    15 days ago

    What’s the excuse here? “Afab players are too stupid to face trans opponents”?

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    15 days ago

    The Times reports that she claimed some cisgender women players were considering quitting, fearing unfair competition

    At least with the more physical sports there’s a (spurious) argument about bone structure or whatever. There really isn’t that same argument wrt Chess, even if it be a bit physically taxing.

  • Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Chess “is diverse and inclusive,” the German Chess Federation said

    Lol, lmao even. It’s one of the more sexist sports there are in terms of organization, often marginalizing women and most of these marginalizing structures are still there to this day. This isn’t to excuse anti-LGBT rhetoric, but pretending like everything is fine with chess probably doesn’t help.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    I have, and never will, understand how the fuck being trans gives you any sort of advantage in chess. Only thing I have ever rationalized about this is that the people saying it surely must be sexist cave people.