Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-223 days agoA judge has barred Washington from enforcing a state law that would have required Churches to report child abuse. The judge says the law infringed on freedom of religionwashingtonstatestandard.comexternal-linkmessage-square177linkfedilinkarrow-up1640arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: open_christian@lemmy.causa@midwest.social
arrow-up1628arrow-down1external-linkA judge has barred Washington from enforcing a state law that would have required Churches to report child abuse. The judge says the law infringed on freedom of religionwashingtonstatestandard.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-223 days agomessage-square177linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: open_christian@lemmy.causa@midwest.social
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·22 days agoI know what it means. It the law only applies to some people.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·21 days agoIt literally doesn’t, that’s kind of the point of the ruling.
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·21 days agoThe ruling allows churches to ignore child abuse. This ruling was BAD.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·21 days agoOkay sure, but why do you have to make false statements in response to the bad ruling? Why do you get upset when people correct you for that?
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 days agoWhat false statements? I am not upset at all lol.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 days agoThat its legal to rape and murder, you think thats a factual statement? That catholic priests are gaining special privileges by not facing charges for a law specifically targetting confessionals? You think these are all true?
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·20 days agoYou must be very religious to defend these child fuckers like you are.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-220 days agoI’m actually opposed to the concept of religion. I’m also opposed to people like you making any specific religion illegal.
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·20 days agoYou’re obviously not listening to me at all. You would allow a religion to rape children and go unpunished as long as that is part of their religion? You should be shot.
I know what it means.
It the law only applies to some people.
It literally doesn’t, that’s kind of the point of the ruling.
The ruling allows churches to ignore child abuse. This ruling was BAD.
Okay sure, but why do you have to make false statements in response to the bad ruling? Why do you get upset when people correct you for that?
What false statements? I am not upset at all lol.
That its legal to rape and murder, you think thats a factual statement? That catholic priests are gaining special privileges by not facing charges for a law specifically targetting confessionals? You think these are all true?
You must be very religious to defend these child fuckers like you are.
I’m actually opposed to the concept of religion. I’m also opposed to people like you making any specific religion illegal.
You’re obviously not listening to me at all.
You would allow a religion to rape children and go unpunished as long as that is part of their religion? You should be shot.