• Tetra@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re definitely gonna go after the wayback machine next, because what use is there in controlling social media and deleting what bothers them, if there’s freely accessible records of it somewhere else?

    The archive needs to be protected at all costs.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if and how wanting to protect the Wayback machine is compatible with the overall sentiment (on Lemmy) that people need all necessary means to protect their privacy. Wouldn’t people who want that users can protect their privacy also be against the Wayback machine?

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can already ask the Internet Archive to take down a content if you can proof the content is yours (e.g. can’t just buy an old domain and demand the internet archive to delete the archived contents put up by the past owners). People also regularly ask them to take down harmful contents as well.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          (e.g. can’t just buy an old domain and demand the internet archive to delete the archived contents put up by the past owners)

          This is false. My father owned a particular domain that transferred ownership to me. I was able to pull down stuff from prior to my ownership just fine without providing any evidence.

          • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wait, you just asked the Internet Archive to take down stuff, and they complied without asking for proof of ownership? This seems to run counter with their own guidelines.