Chloyster [she/her]@beehaw.orgM to Gaming@beehaw.org · 1 year agoStarfield has housing system, player jail, and more reveals Bethesda in new Q&Awww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up112arrow-down10cross-posted to: xbox@lemmy.world
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-linkStarfield has housing system, player jail, and more reveals Bethesda in new Q&Awww.eurogamer.netChloyster [she/her]@beehaw.orgM to Gaming@beehaw.org · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: xbox@lemmy.world
minus-squareCleoTheWizard@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes but they had an incentive to stay with it. It’s actively profitable. Whereas with star field not so much
minus-squareacastcandream@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoStarfield isn’t even out yet you’ve already decided 1) it’s bad 2) it’s broken and 3) it’s abandoned. I’m not sure what in their history indicates to you they’d abandon it. That one is particularly weird to me.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoWell, it will probably be broken. Name one Bethesda Studios game that wasn’t broken at launch. But fair points otherwise.
Yes but they had an incentive to stay with it. It’s actively profitable. Whereas with star field not so much
Starfield isn’t even out yet you’ve already decided 1) it’s bad 2) it’s broken and 3) it’s abandoned.
I’m not sure what in their history indicates to you they’d abandon it. That one is particularly weird to me.
Well, it will probably be broken.
Name one Bethesda Studios game that wasn’t broken at launch.
But fair points otherwise.