Komoot has always rubbed me the wrong way with its aggressive marketing tbh.

I reckon most people lurking here browse BP anyway, really only posting this because i was surprised to see somebody in the comments giving a shoutout to this community! 😊

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    the difference is that OpenCycleMap maps actual roads and cycle paths. Kamoot is more for journeys (e.g. recommended routes), which might use cyclepaths, but often won’t. They aren’t physical things, they are like a pub crawl for biking.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sure, but that just describes a navigation function. On any OSM client you can select the cycle mode and it will pick an optimal route which uses whatever cyclepaths are available. The result is the same.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        What @Bonjourmadame@lemmy.ca said. It’s not about getting from A to B in the fastest or shortest possible way, it’s about getting there in the most fun way, or the most beautiful way, or (going by some of my bikenut friends’ apparent preferences) the most arduous and punishing way possible. It’s about touring, not travelling. The journey, not the destination.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah yeah I get all that. I just don’t see what actual information Komoot provides that will procure me “the most beautiful” journey that’s not already available in the standard OSM dataset. Anyway, I’ve made my point.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Here is an example route guide: https://bikepacking.com/routes/attack-of-the-buns/

            I’ve done this route (or 2/3 of it before my bike broke and I had to get towed out on a dodgy fire trail for 8km, the limp home). There is a LOT of information on that page. Not just the GPX, but also condition info, tips on timing, where to eat, sleep, etc. etc.

            How much of that information do you think is storable in OSM, considering that most of it applies to the route, and not to the underlying map features (which is what OSM is good for storing)?

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              OSM has info on just about every local amenity imaginable, I find there’s almost too much of it. As for “tips on timing” or any other hand-holding, don’t need it, don’t want it. Personally I enjoy discovery and being surprised when travelling. It’s also why I never watch videos of my destinations in advance, only text if possible.

              Each to their own. No need to take this personally, if you get value out of this stuff then that’s great.

                • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  This is silly. I asked for clarification about the features of Komoot. I got clarification. I offered my thoughts. End of story.

                  • naught101@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    You came in telling people that kamoot is pointless and could all be done with OSM, without understanding what the actual functionality was.