TLDW from ChatGPT:

The video is a critique of the Debian Linux distribution’s website and its user experience, primarily focusing on the difficulties in finding and downloading the appropriate ISO images. The presenter praises Debian’s stability and community but criticizes the website’s design, stating that it’s not user-friendly, especially for new Linux users. The video highlights how the website layout, multiple clicks, and confusing file tree structure can make it challenging to locate the desired ISO images, particularly for the live installer versions. The presenter suggests that while improvements have been made, the ISO download process can still be convoluted and feels like the distribution is not encouraging new users. The overall message conveys a desire for Debian to make its ISOs more easily accessible and user-friendly.

  • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re spot on. I had this thought last week while trying to find an ISO. It’s like it’s a state secret or something. 😆

    Fedora, OpenSuse, Arch, Gentoo, Kali, and Armbian all make it easy to find an ISO or image to get started. The free RHEL downloads are the only thing more hidden then Debian downloads.

      • guillermohs9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but there is a point. I’m not a Linux newbie, but sometimes you can get lost looking for the iso file that includes firmware, or non-free, or certain desktop. On most distro’s pages, the big fat button leads to a direct link to the iso file and another to a torrent at most.

        • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I do agree that the website is bad, nowadays the main iso includes non-free firmware, and it’s the same installer for all DEs.

          • guillermohs9@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well that’s nice, I think last Debian I downloaded what buster or something so I might have been talking about old experiences. They’re still making the user navigate through an FTP-like file structure to find the current amd64 iso?

              • biddy@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I gave it another shot having not attempted for a few years, I was looking for the most complete, stable, non-free, offline, x64 image for a USB flash drive. I failed very quickly because I didn’t know whether I needed a CD or DVD image. A few minutes of clicking through random and irrelevant “FAQs” and I finally found an answer I understood but only through experience, CD images are smaller than 700mb and my flash drive is large, so I wanted a DVD image. Back to the top, and I found the image I needed.

                So it took a few minutes, and I’ve done this several times before. A new user would have absolutely no clue.

                • quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re describing that you want something that isn’t the standard installer, with the ability to do offline installs. A new user with no clue about anything would probably just use the top link and run the graphic installer, ending up with the same system as if he/she had downloaded the dvd version. Is your criticism that internet is a requirement for the standard installer?

                  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Correction. A new user, meaning an actual normie Windows user rather than a nerd like people in this discussion, will get absolutely nowhere trying to install Debian. “Here’s the ISO” means nothing to the average person and anyway that’s only 5% of the process of getting the thing up and running.

                  • biddy@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Kind of. My criticism is that a new user will end up with that net installer without realizing it, which may not be what they want, confusing them further. Bypassing the website is not a good solution, there’s important information there like the install guide. ISO downloads are only one example of how the website is hard to navigate, even if they manage to skip that step it’s only going go make it harder in the future.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          You gotta download it either way, netinstall or not. At least that way you can pick and choose what you actually need. Are you trying to set up a computer in the woods?

          • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sometimes, yeah. There are a lot shit networks out there.

            With the full, I can at least get a functioning base system without needing a network connection. With the net, network no worky, no Debian.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ISO is one tenth of the problem. The average non-techie Linux neophyte is not going to have a clue what to do next once they have downloaded this ISO thing, even if they somehow managed to pick the right one. Debian’s onboarding for ordinary users is just disastrously bad.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why does every single distro HAVE to cater to noobs? If someone wants “easy” Debian, then they can use Mint or Ubuntu. Debian is the distro you go to once you’ve outgrown those two. It’s meant for technical applications, like servers and network infrastructure, not really something like casual browsing or gaming.

          • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Anecdata: I used Debian before using Ubuntu. Debian is not just for servers, it works fine on personal computers. And ethically it is better than Ubuntu, more so now than ever. But the onboarding process is a mess. When I have just replaced my laptop and I’m on bad wifi struggling to ditch Windows, and I don’t have a piece of paper handy with all the arguments on an obscure dd command, and I risk bricking my machine, I need a bulletproof onboarding process. That was why I moved to Ubuntu. I never cared about “outgrowing” an OS, my concerns are more about privacy and ethics. Well, one would hope that these things might be available to all people one day. That was what Debian was supposed to be for.

          • nik282000@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone who uses Debian for browsing and gaming, I agree. It is a tool that you pick because you have a goal in mind and I pretty much never recommend it as an intro to Linux for new users. The only reason I continue to use it as a desktop/laptop is for consistency between all my machines so I don’t have to remember how to use 8 different package managers.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently by “people” you are referring to experienced technical users like yourself. Everyone else will need to learn what an ISO is, which one is needed, and how exactly to transform that file into a bootable USB stick. This means intense hand-holding from beginning to end. Which is possible, because other distros manage it. Debian does not.

          • nik282000@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If a user is that far down the technical literacy ladder, they do not need Debian, they need Ubuntu or Mint or one of a dozen other distros that prioritize UX over production.