If you were eating a soup from a bowl with 500ml of soup taking 25ml spoonfuls, and the rain replaced the volume that you ate at the same rate as you ate it, how many spoon fulls would it take for the soup to be completely replaced with water? Also, when that happens, would it still be the same soup?

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 days ago

    Wow, someone actually bothered to do it properly! I just wrote some horrible R code and ended up with 1146 spoons to get to 50% probability of having either 1 or 0 soup molecules. So good to see that the answers were so close.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      :)

      What I would like to do is give a margin of error, e.g. “there is a 95% change that it will be between spoonful 1000 and spoonful 1300” or something like that. But I don’t have the time to figure that out now, sounds like it would be harder to figure out than the expected value.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            I thought of making a vector with a length of about 1.671398e+25, but then I remembered what one time when when I tried to make a linear model with hundreds of dimensions. So yeah… We have gigabytes of RAM, and it’s still not enough. Not really a problem, as long as you don’t try to do anything completely ridiculous.

            Instead, I just made a variable that simply contains the number of soup molecules and another one for the number of water molecules. Far simpler that way.

            Here’s where the magic happens:

            # Number of soup molecules drawn
            soup_molecules_replaced <- rbinom(1, replacement_count, prob_soup)
            

            The rbinom function is used to generate random numbers from a binomial distribution. It’s a discrete probability distribution that models the number of successes, i.e. scooping out a soup molecule. Rest of the codes is just basic infrastructure like variables, loops, etc.

            BTW the variable names look ugly, because I couldn’t be bothered to tidy everything up. I really prefer camelCase, whereas Mistral seems to prefer underscores. That’s what you get for vibing.

            Side note: If you do this kind of stuff for private purposes, you have to rely on your own hardware. If you plan to publish your discoveries, universities and publicly funded supercomputers might be an option. If there exists a Journal Of Recreational Mathematics And Useless Simulations (JORMAUS), I could totally publish this stuff and maybe even run my code on a supercomputer.

            • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Interesting. I don’t know why I didn’t think of just keeping a count of soup molecules. Must have been late!

              Another interesting point, your simulation is subtly wrong in a different way from my calculation. When there is only one soup molecule left, there is a chance (however tiny) that rbinom will return 2 or more, taking out more soup molecules than there really are.

              If you run it enough times with a bowl of 3 molecules and a spoon of 2 molecules, I’m sure you’ll hit -1 soup molecules some of the time.

              For a simulation I think we can do better. There must be a random function that does it properly. The function we want is like pulling balls of 2 colors out of a sack without replacement. Pretty common combinatorics question, I would expect a random function to match.

              • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                You’re right. I just ran rbinom 1E7 times and found that the probability of over drawing soup molecules is a bit too high for my taste.

                When there’s only 1 left, you usually end up drawing 0 or 1 molecule. However, in rare cases, it can be higher, such as 2, 3, 4… molecules.

                About 92% was 0, and 7.7% was 1, but the others were not negligible! There’s about 0.3% probability of over drawing, which is way too high for a simulation as serious as this one. In this quick test, there were 20 incidents where rbinom wanted to pull out 4 soup molecules when only 1 was available. We can’t have that, now can we!

        • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          You rock! Thank you :)

          If I find myself in the right mood I might try to work out the actual distribution. If I do, your simulation will be a very handy sanity check!

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Thanks!

            If you want, I can increase the sample size. Just need to figure out how to add a timer to the code and set it to run for a few hours, maybe even overnight. A histogram with 10^6 bins should look pretty smooth.

            Should also upgrade the visualization to ggplot2. Frivolous computations like this deserve no less.