Xylight@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 5 days agoCGNAT version 2sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square62linkfedilinkarrow-up1483arrow-down11
arrow-up1482arrow-down1imageCGNAT version 2sh.itjust.worksXylight@lemdro.id to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square62linkfedilink
minus-squarebss03@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoYeah, the Universe keep making bigger fools (of us all). But, we should still use IPv6 instead of clawing the tattered remains of IPv4. I just wish my ISP agreed.
minus-square🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agowithout a doubt ipv6 is an improvement. only loss is that it’s humanely possible to remember ipv4 addressed, but that ain’t necessary. my only “objection” is that an actual solution should accommodate unlimited growth, rather than what we consider a big enough number.
Yeah, the Universe keep making bigger fools (of us all). But, we should still use IPv6 instead of clawing the tattered remains of IPv4. I just wish my ISP agreed.
without a doubt ipv6 is an improvement. only loss is that it’s humanely possible to remember ipv4 addressed, but that ain’t necessary.
my only “objection” is that an actual solution should accommodate unlimited growth, rather than what we consider a big enough number.