• greengnu@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The cost of hydrogen is not the fuel cells but that hydrogen is made from oil.

      • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        There are two practical ways to make hydrogen:

        1. Split water molecules via electrolysis. This is thermally inefficient and not cost-effective at scale.

        2. Strip hydrogen atoms off of hydrocarbon molecules, usually natural gas. It’s much cheaper. Unfortunately, the leftover carbon atoms leave the process as CO2. AFAIK all commercially available hydrogen is made this way.

      • bruhbeans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        It takes a ton of energy to split water into it’s components, that typically comes from fossil energy

          • Badabinski@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            There’s still a place for producing hydrogen via electrolysis (chemical feedstock), but anyone who wants to burn hydrogen is either selling you a rocket (good) or an excuse to keep sucking up that crude. The answer to our energy problems is still just solar, wind, batteries, and other renewables.

      • perestroika@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Most of it, currently, yes.

        But there is no requirement to do it that way.

        (Also, the people who run fuel cells typically don’t buy fossil hydrogen.)