• dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes because that is more user friendly than running an executable through a built in compatibility layer… suure

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who tf wants usability when shit just has a solution no matter what. Additionally its an old program that a normal person wouldn’t even try.

      On windows shit just doesn’t work and the solutions are most of the time not even existing.

    • riskable@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re trying to get ancient software to work I think “user friendliness” is the least of your concerns. Especially compared to the alternative (Windows) where the answer is just, “No: That’s not going to work no matter what you do.”