I still remember the day Shireen Abu Akleh was martyred. My mother called me crying. She had grown up watching Shireen, who was an invited guest into her home every day while she lived in Palestine. I remember when my mom called me after Israel dropped their first bomb in Gaza, the same tears, a different type of violence. And yesterday, my mom called me again to talk about Anas. Anas al-Sharif’s voice was one I’ve come to intimately know over the last two years, and one we will never hear again. Because, like the almost 300 journalists in Gaza that Israel has killed, Anas represented the truth. And truth is a threat to Israel.
For 22 months, the international community has watched Israel systematically murder journalists and called it acceptable losses in a just war. Nearly 300 media workers have been killed, the deadliest conflict for journalists in recorded history. Yet the world’s response has been to write strongly worded letters while shipping more weapons. Where are the sanctions that followed Russia’s invasion? Where are the war crimes tribunals that prosecuted Rwandan generals? Where is the global media solidarity that should transcend borders and politics? Apparently that only exists when the victims are not Palestinian.
Under Article 79 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, journalists are explicitly protected as civilians in armed conflict zones. Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including journalists, constitutes a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and amounts to grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions. The law is clear. The crime is obvious. But, Israel has transformed every Palestinian journalist into a “legitimate target” by simply calling them terrorists first.
The western media is complicit in the whole genocide.
It’s probably better to be more specific than “The Western Media.” Remaining generic makes it easier to handwave the criticism and point fingers elsewhere. Sympathetic voices inside of Western media nod along and think “Yes, not me, but others.”
It’s all one giant conglomerate. There are barely any non-government ran Western media.
This runs up against the problem of having to name virtually every mainstream media outlet. Naming a specific one ends up providing more cover for the unnamed outlets.
Generic works here because of how widespread complicity is across mainstream media in europe, america, and the commonwealth.
I think you’re right, but why not name virtually every mainstream media outlet? Let it show up in their search results. Prompt them for a response, and create a firm record for others to follow. It requires more effort, but the truth always does.
They were all involved in a murder?
Or maybe “complicit” is intended to mean more than “I wanted them to write about it more”?
Dude, I doubt you even think netanyahu is complicit.
“Western Media”, LOL.
And, someone doesn’t know what “complicit” means.
Don’t you have something even worse to do?