• Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Um… Sweeny is just covering up the fact that his ENGINE SUCKS AT OPTIMIZATION IN GENERAL.

    Sorry… had to get that off my chest.

  • D06M4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yet Tim Sweeney marketed Nanite, Lumen and other sparkly smoke in UE5 for the opposite. Because who needs a decent development team getting paid to polish things and put wit over bloat when a monkey could just leave the default resource hungry settings and call it a day? Props for UE3 though. UE3 was tight.

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Okay, I work as a programmer, and there is a reason projects work the opposite way. You first have to have a working product that comes back as good from whatever QA you have, then you optimise and build on it. If you have to optimise on day 1, nothing will ever get done. I should know, that’s why I have a ton of personal projects in development hell.

    Why would games be different?

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, putting in a bit of thinking before you actually hit the keyboard can be an incredibly effective form of optimization, if you can get for example an O(n^2) down to an O(log n). You’ll even save time on not having to rework the thing later, and if you build on poor foundations, chances are you’ll stumble upon fundamental architectural challenges down the road, which can be extremely costly in terms of development time.

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, taking some care early on can pay dividends down the road. The data structures you choose really matter, and YAGNI can stop you from going overboard with indirection and other shit. Premature optimization is bad, but there’s nothing wrong with writing performant software as long as it’s still comprehensible and extensible.

    • homoludens@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m currently working on a project that has been optimized from the start. No one understands the state of objects or what is supposed to happen in which order (because the lead implemented his own special way of lazy loading). So we have a lot of bugs and everyone is always double checking everything, killing any optimization that might have been there.

    • fulg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I work in games, the reason it works the opposite for them is because Unreal Editor is a product that is also shipped.

      Sadly for most of us, the tools used to make the game (that includes the engine) are for internal use only, and most of the time there is no army of programmers available to do all of the work ahead of time. So it pays to wait and focus on the hot path used by the game you are shipping right now and not a hypothetical one you might ship later.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I can build everything in one level at the start or I can build it across multiple levels and stream it.

      Which one I do should be done at the start.

      And of course if I’m targeting a 4090 then hoping to slap DLSS on it then it’s not going to work. I could pull a TI and turn AO off then pretend UE5 is the problem but it’s really just a developer issue.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Games don’t have unit tests so you can’t quickly make code changes without breaking the world

      Who knows if the engine is any different

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can absolutely make unit and even integration tests in games, but I agree that I don’t think it’s really done because of the domain. Things are more caught in QA or more like Early Access these days.

  • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My issue with Unreal Engine 5 is pretty much exclusively Lumen.

    Developers turn it on and call it a day. No baked lighting. No reflection probes. Just blurry reflections and blurry shadows with FSR on top for extra blurriness.

    It runs and looks like absolute ass and I simply stopped buying UE5 games that use it.

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Pretty much every UE5 game I have played so far has it, with very few providing fallbacks to old school lighting.

        To list some of the worst offenders I can remember right now:

        • Lords of the Fallen (2023)
        • Remnant II
        • Talos Principle 2 and Talos Principle Reawakened
        • Wuchang: Fallen Feathers
        • Supraworld
        • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          I looooove Talos Principle but my hardware is getting long in the tooth and 2 runs so blurry (and not well enough to compensate) that I gave up on buying the 1 Remaster, even though I really wanted to play the new bonus chapter…

  • kennedy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    every time I see a game has great graphics and is made with UE 5 I never get it anymore because I know it’ll run like ass on my PC. I’m not a billionaire who can afford a fancy computer with a GPU.

    • simsalabim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think this is a case, where there’s an engine that was developed for graphics cards, that epic thought were common when they created UE5. They expected that RT performance would not only increase in the highest pricing tier, but also in mid-range (as in $500 pricing range) to a degree, where all the lumen stuff would be trivial. But steam survey reveals that most people use X060, X050 and then some X070 class cards, where RT performance isn’t that great. https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/

      So IMO there are several issues:

      • There are obviously optimization issues with UE5, I’m not going to claim otherwise.
      • Nvidia catering to the AI crowd, which is obviously more lucrative for them that improving RT performance for mid- and low-range cards.
      • Epic being bad at forecasting the future state of graphics performance.
      • Epic trying to offload workload from development to the end user (e.g. shifting from pre-baked lighting to realtime lighting).

      The end result stays the same, we now play games that run so bad on current hardware, that everything now needs to be AI-upscaled with framegen and has this weird soft look that will look super dated at some point because RT isn’t there yet.

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      What, you guys don’t have a personal nuclear reactor powering your 5090 GPU to run games on Super Ultra full RT settings at 480p upscaled to 4K?

  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    On the subject of what a steaming fucking load UE5 is… Well, in short, Robocop should be one of the best games I’ve ever played, but it’s a barely functional disaster and that’s entirely the fault of Epic. The game itself is amazing, but the engine is on par with unpatched Fallout New Vegas.