Does anyone know FLOSS replacements for Ground News?

I’ve seen some good things Ground News does.

Like seeing the same story under different media outlets and seeing representation of a story across the political spectrum.

I currently use RSS feed readers, I think something like what Ground is, would help organize my media at least.

This is the website: https://web.ground.news/

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    i use a custom n8n routine to gather and vet news. im just trading one ai for one I make the mistakes with

  • Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Ground news is a service, if you like it, pay for it.

    That kind of stuff is not where FOSS excels

  • RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hi, I want to warn you about services claiming to sell “unbiased” advice : Ground news is biased, their alignment of left and right is subjective as all politics is.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Not just that, but their definition of “left” often veers into the downright ludicrous. Sometimes i think the whole thing is just another psyop to move the Overton window ever farther right.

      • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, the definitions are actually more about alignment with the US political parties rather than left or right. And since both parties are demonstrably right of center, just to different degrees, the bias meter should only be used to determine which political party’s sponsors likely biased the article.

        For example, an article saying climate change is not human caused and presenting debunked evidence will be ranked mostly center and second mostly right. But an article calling for incentives to reduce use of fossils fuels will be ranked mostly left. That’s mostly center if anything. An article calling for the government to explicitly force companies to stop using fossil fuels would be mostly left and center. One further advocating for the government to take over energy companies that don’t comply and make energy production public would be mostly left. Just presenting scientific evidence and refusing to give a voice to debunked “alternative facts” is not a leftist position, it’s a centrist one at best and should be the baseline.

      • RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, as a french person it still shock me that some US are considered left leaning when they are just billionaires mouth pieces.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        They do make it possible to adjust the ratings on your own account for the ones you disagree on. It doesn’t affect the newsletters, but I find those to be too american-specific anyway

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I know Google sucks, and it’s not foss obviously, but I generally just use news.google.com to view numerous takes on each story by dozens of outlets. Really helps figure out what is actually happening

  • sbird@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You could always group your feeds. I have mine grouped based on topic (news, science, technology, etc.) but I guess you could always group them based on political spectrum.