I really hate to quote a media organization controlled by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.

But I feel the the author is not completely wrong

  • Ilandar@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Many of the people in attendance probably didn’t feel they had a better recourse for expressing their views publicly: this was their most viable opportunity to be seen on the streets, and they did so with an understanding that there were bound to be some views expressed that they don’t fully condone, and that, for all its flaws, and occasional friendless mean-spirited souls who had brought offensive placards, they were there on balance, partner at their side, even pushing a pram, to make their voice heard about an issue that matters to them.

    There is no “on balance” with racism. If you know the protest is being organised by racists, will be attended by racists and will have racist speakers, you don’t get to turn up and say “but I’m not a racist I’m here for some other reason”. And you can’t tell me these people went in completely blind, the problems with this protest were all over mainstream and social media beforehand. What kind of person sees/hears about racist red flags and decides to attend anyway? We have a word for them.

    • Tenderizer@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      If someone’s views are hostile to a minority, even if they’re not hatred-driven, they should NOT express them publicly. There are plenty of private channels to reach out to politicians that won’t intimidate a vulnerable group. The mere act of expressing these anti-immigration views publicly is itself unacceptable.

      • Ilandar@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yes, I strongly agree. It has an “othering” effect which is often the gateway to hatred.