• PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the same for piracy, you can’t expect people that don’t have the money to play games that they have to pay for. Nothing beast free when you just have a phone or chrome book and download a game or play embeded after watching ads. The graph didn’t tell you where the money come from or the avg dollar spend per player.

    • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The graph and tables are for total revenue across the industry and they even separate ad revenue into a different category. What this shows is that freemium is more expensive than paid at this point.

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s simply a matter of volume. Everyone has a phone, not everyone has a console or gaming pc

        • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is some merit to that but we aren’t just counting players. People seem to be ultimately paying more. If mobile gaming was more available but also more affordable the revenue might not surpass console and PC games.

          Which is no surprise, since most freemium games are structured to get players spending, dangling extra lives and new characters in front of them, often escalating to the point where even people grinding hours every day struggle to advance without paying. It’s not uncommon to see people in mobile gaming communities saying how they spent thousands of dollars on a game and regretting it, something that is not even a possibility for console games without microtransactions.