QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 days agono rulessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1402arrow-down13
arrow-up1399arrow-down1imageno rulessh.itjust.worksQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 17 days agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squareYoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up52·17 days agoHmmm…seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up… ^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$ ^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$ ^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$ Much better.
minus-squareYoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·17 days agoYeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain’t that dedicated to the bit
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·17 days agoYou’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
minus-squaredeath_to_carrots@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·17 days agoI don’t see the problem.
Hmmm…seems too ambiguous - gotta use standard syntax, hold up…
^(s|t)?hey?(?!m)$^t?h(e|i)(m|r)$^t?h(e|i){1,2}r?s$Much better.
Passes:
shem
slaanesh will be pleased
Michael Jackson intensifies
Yeah I gave up on narrowing the scope, I ain’t that dedicated to the bit
You’re not necessarily wrong for it. The source material is nonsense to begin with, so who’s to say what the right test cases are?
I don’t see the problem.
^(they|he|she)$
Regex vibes