When trying to convince people to move to Fediverse services, people will often refer to them as “alternatives”, calling Mastodon a Twitter-alternative, PeerTube a YouTube-alternative, etc. But I don’t think this is the most effective approach.

This is a problem I noticed before I even heard of the Fediverse, because FOSS advocates do the same thing.

The issue is that to the average person, THING-alternative just means that if you already have THING, you don’t need it. Or even worse, people will assume it’s an inferior imitator. Most people aren’t looking for “alternatives”. When they adopt new social media it’s in response to trends.

Look at mainstream social media for example. When TikTok appeared as a new video platform, it didn’t call itself a “YouTube alternative”.

So, at a minimum, I would advise not referring to services as “alternatives” but simply “cool new services/apps” and exalting their best features from a user perspective.

I have other thoughts on how to advertise the Fediverse, but I don’t want to make this post too long.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’ve never worked in marketing but I imagine it’s hard. People don’t care about things. Certainly not remote or abstract things like “centralized control” or “tomorrow”.

    You could probably just do “Oh yeah, lemmy has good memes and posts” and be done, and only go into technical details if they ask.