Food and agriculture contribute one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions – second only to the burning of fossil fuels. And yet the vast majority of media coverage of the climate crisis overlooks this critical sector, according to a new data analysis from Sentient Media.

The findings suggest that only about a quarter of climate articles in 11 major US outlets, including the Guardian, mention food and agriculture as a cause. And of the 940 articles analyzed, only 36 – or 3.8% – mentioned animal agriculture or meat production, by far the largest source of food-related emissions.

The data reveals a media environment that obscures a key driver of the climate crisis. Meat production alone is responsible for nearly 60% of the food sector’s climate emissions and yet its impact is sorely underestimated: a 2023 Washington Post/University of Maryland poll found 74% of US respondents believe eating less meat has little to no effect on the climate crisis.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is really a symtom of advertisment driven media. You can sell electric cars and solar panels. They tried selling you meat substitutes for a while, but you can’t sell just eating less meat 🤷

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      and unfortunately, heavy subsidies on cattle farming make the meat and dairy substitutes more expensive than what they try to substitute.