• PreachHard@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe that was the original intent of the word, just wondering if it’s essentially defunct because of how it’s used now.

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The term (or the term whataboutery, which it emerged from) was originally used by pro-British newspapers during the troubles to complain that when people would whine about IRA activities others would respond by pointing out that their direct opposition, the British, were committing atrocities.

        It’s always been a tool for Western hegemony to avoid criticism and accusations of hypocrisy.

        • PreachHard@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wow that was definitely an enlightening read on the etymology, so the word was fucked from the get go haha…

          Sean O’Conaill (1976) - 'I would not suggest such a thing were it not for the Whatabouts. These are the people who answer every condemnation of the Provisional I.R.A. with an argument to prove the greater immorality of the “enemy”, and therefore the justice of the Provisionals’ cause: “What about Bloody Sunday, internment, torture, force feeding, army intimidation?”. ’

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see, my mistake, though from a descriptivist standpoint a meaning that a word long-since lost and one that it never had are virtually the same thing on a functional level