• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, people invented religions in an attempt to explain things that they did not understand.

    Things that the scientific method has allowed us to understand.

    That is not science.

    • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a cute story that provides a tidy explanation for religion, but is it supported by the anthropological evidence? Where are your sources? Are you sure you’re not just making up stories in an attempt to explain things that you do not understand?

        • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Perhaps you could provide the search query terms which will lead me to an empirical study confirming your hypothesis? I’m not sure what to search to find your evidence for you.

            • JesusChristLover420@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Your hypothesis was that people use religion to explain the unknown, while this study concludes that religious people are more likely to judge the unknown as unknowable. Needless to say, one cannot explain the unknowable. Therefore, your hypothesis is countered by this evidence.

              Once again, science proves that tidy little stories atheists make up to explain the world around us are just that - stories. Next time, I’d suggest avoiding speculation you can’t back up with empirical research.