5·
1 天前Oh, look, brainrot.
Krusty
Born to lose, live to win.
- 0 Posts
- 158 Comments
Joined 18 天前
Cake day: 2026年5月3日
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
5·1 天前So that’s where mancala comes from.
55·1 天前get out the vote!
No! Don’t vote for who you actually want. WTF is wrong with you?
Fun.
response in a forum puts people off
I don’t care. I can’t fix stupid. I can explain things. I can’t understand them for you.
People that make claims without evidence will have them dismissed for exactly that reason. If that’s putting you off, then kiss off.
4·1 天前It’s from a movie called Zardoz. Sean Connery in red underwear and red suspenders that double as bullet holders. With thigh high black boots and a pony tail.
If your not sure whether to be aroused or terrified, that’s understandable.
6·1 天前Strictly civilians? Probably around 10x more Ukrainians. At least 15,000+ with several times that injured. Russians, probably in the thousands at most.
You have been raised up from Brutality, to kill the Brutals who multiply, and are legion. To this end, Zardoz your God gave you the gift of the Gun. The Gun is good! The Penis is evil! The Penis shoots Seeds, and makes new Life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was. But the Gun shoots Death and purifies the Earth of the filth of Brutals. Go forth, and kill!
Zardoz has spoken.
6·1 天前Around (4 to 6) * 10^(26 to 27) J total
1 gigawatt is 10^9 J/s (so around 130 billion years to reach the above.) For a terawatt that’s 130 million years. For a petawatt 130,000 years. For an exawatt about 130 years…
Note: the sun bathes Earth with around 170,000 TW (0.17 exawatts) of energy. That’s about 700-800 years if you could make the oceans sink all that sun energy. Again, this isn’t the total output of the Sun but just what impacts Earth directly.
The reference is my formal education in the subject matter. I’m honestly quite certain this person needs an education more than a paper that without such an education they’d fail to comprehend.
It’s a search engine for scientific literature.
I’m set off? 😂
It’s very difficult to prove a negative. There’s tons of papers out there with weak evidence and poor methodologies and very low citations claiming various non-ionizing EM are bad. The problem is the lack of reproducibility. You can look up meta-analysis on this, if you like.
2·3 天前Well shit, now you’re in a list.
There’s also a large selection effect. Organizations often reward traits adjacent to psychopathy:
- emotional detachment under pressure,
- relentless competitiveness,
- charisma without empathy,
- willingness to externalize harm,
- obsession with growth and dominance.
351·3 天前Also even if you didn’t cook it the germs that live in soil are not the same germs that make you sick, those you get from your fellow humans.
Ya, sure, you’ve obviously never heard of gardia, tetanus, botulism, histoplasmosis, anthrax, E coli, salmonella, and the ever popular listeria. Plus you could pick up a party of parasites and worms.
Very pastoral. Very grounding. Touch grass, acquire necrotizing fasciitis.
But who ferments broccoli?
My big thing was cook your vegetables and limit fruit intake, especially because he prizes over ripe and high fructose fruit.
He’d basically would leave fruit out to rot, covered in fruit flies, and then he would still eat that shit. I got him to put that shit in a bowl and cover it with a towel.
He would complain though. The flies need to eat, too.
So he would throw compostable material around his yard… Which arrested pests, naturally. Then there was the rats in the walls and ceilings… But the rent was cheap!
I’m not sure what you’re asking for… Bluetooth is extremely low power. An order of magnitude from consumer WiFi. Which itself is far less than cellular signals, which are far weaker than broadcast (radio and TV.)
That’s an oversimplification of the evidence. The strongest associations in nutritional research are usually with ultra-processed foods, excess caloric intake, obesity, alcohol, smoking, low fiber intake, and poor cardiometabolic health overall, not simply “meat bad.”
There’s also an important distinction between processed meat and unprocessed meat. The evidence linking processed meats like hot dogs and deli meats to colorectal cancer is much stronger than the evidence against unprocessed meat, like steak or fish fillets.
Nutrition science also struggles with confounding variables. People who eat large amounts of vegetables often differ in many other ways too: lower smoking rates, more exercise, lower alcohol intake, higher income, better healthcare access, etc. Untangling those effects is difficult.
Even “plant-based” processed foods are not automatically healthy. Many modern substitutes are highly refined products with isolated proteins, emulsifiers, seed oils, sugars, and micronutrient fortification used to imitate the nutrient profile of animal foods. And those are the good ones! The bad ones just slap oat milk on a box put a bunch of water and sugar in it and that’s about all it is.
Matching nutrient labels is not necessarily the same thing as matching bioavailability, digestion kinetics, or long-term physiological effects.
A more scientifically defensible generalization would simply be: diets centered around minimally processed whole foods tend to correlate with better long-term health outcomes than diets dominated by ultra-processed foods, regardless of whether those foods are animal- or plant-derived.
No. I just use the default. The forks are typically far behind… I tend to use the nightly builds. Cuz I like to find bugs and document them. :)
ML is a bunch of edgelords that crave licking boot.
From the public comments indexed in search results, the account seems politically left-wing and fairly combative in tone. For example, in one discussion about Chinese internet censorship, the user argued that some people “absolutely … do need someone controlling the information they consume” and also commented that propaganda can still be factually correct.
Fucking tankies…