PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]

amerikkka Anarchist, autistic, engineer, and Certified Professional Life-Regretter. If you got a brick of text, don’t be alarmed; that’s normal.

No, I’m not interested in voting for your candidate.

  • 23 Posts
  • 1.16K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • Well…I think the “home” part of homework is also a problem. IMO we should really do review work at school or in some non-home space, and non-recreation time.

    Like the 8 hour work day was supposed to be 8 hours work, 8 hours rest, and 8 hours recreation. School + homework + transit regularly exceeds the 8 hours. (And 8 hours work is way too much, we should be working wildly less with the incredible technologies that have been developed since the 8 hours work day concept was created.)















  • So instead of voting against Trump, I campaigned against him online by telling people to vote for Harris.

    Omfg the Gaza genocide was started [1] during the Biden-Harris administration 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ You’re not helping 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    [1]

    I know Zionism in all its forms and all its actions have been genocidal since inception; I’m talking specifically about stuff that happened during the Biden-Harris administration.


  • No I’m still not interested in voting for your candidate.

    Furthermore, as per rule 7 of this community;

    No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from [rule 6] but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can’t control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

    And finally, while the previous link argued generally against voting in any election, I am in particular never voting for or even supporting in passing a Democrat or Republican for literally the rest of time after the Gaza genocide:

    But the moral prohibition on siding with any administration that endorses genocide will force a different flavor of the exact same logic that centrist liberalism has depended on for so long: hold your nose and align with the least worst thing. Only the least worst thing will no longer be the mild, ethics-agnostic emptiness of modern Western liberalism, nor will it be the multitude of barbaric authoritarians and their secret prisons. It will be communal solidarity, or else nothing, a walking away from all of this. Countless otherwise pragmatic people who would in any other circumstance choose liberalism by default will instead decide none of this is worth the damage to one’s soul. They will instead support no one, vote for no one, wash their hands of any ordering of the world that results in choices no better than this. And the obvious centrist refrain—But do you want the deranged right wing to win?—should, after even a moment of self-reflection, yield to a far more important question: How empty does your message have to be for a deranged right wing to even have a chance of winning? Of all the epitaphs that may one day be written on the gravestone of Western liberalism, the most damning is this: Faced off against a nihilistic, endlessly cruel manifestation of conservatism, and somehow managed to make it close.

    — Omar El-Akkad, One Day Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, correction mine.