I’m comparing the current politically correct interpretation of what you say is the end all be all vs the old fashioned way of biology determined exclusion. If it seems contradictory then my point is proven.
Male puberty gives permanent advantages. HRT can only do so much. The point isn’t the biology though since the current thing is to let anyone who identifies as woman compete against women so why would we change that to say somebody who doesn’t identify as female compete against women?
The point of the women’s leagues is so they don’t have to compete against men because women are biologically unable to compete at the same high level as men. If a biological woman decides not to identify as such why would she be allowed to continue in that league? Isn’t that the point of allowing mtf transgenders to compete against women if they identify as such? It’s logically consistent.
Having tits in a movie is patriarchy.
Speaking of killing. Didn’t it end up killing a bunch of graphics cards?
I’m fairly certain everybody thought it was hilarious except for Wizards of the Coast.
Never heard of it. How many alien conspiracies does it contain?
Queen Cleopatra is a very recent example.
But why though? Why the insistence on portraying people in documentaries or biographies as someone completely different? Why not do a biography on a black dude or black lady who can be played by such instead of trying to change the race of historical figures for fun?
Only as long as you pay protection(apple care).
Have you ever seen a shotgun? It’s kind of hard to maneuver inside a house. They’re pretty long.
I was looking for someone to mention the connection itself. To add to that the connector is a lot more delicate since it’s some 4024 pins vs 3 or 4.
Colt didn’t call it the great equalizer for nothing. Imagine being a 90 lb woman facing rape or death by a 200 lb man. Don’t think for a second anything but a gun will allow her to save herself.
What? They literally have the project up on GitHub.
You mean a few months ago?
I can assure you they’re not engaging and merely down voting things they don’t like.
That has a different connotation. You might want to look where it came from.
Because it’s a graph of incidents and not a per capita representation.
As I stated in a previous posting of this, he’s pointing out that there’s no ideological consistency here. If you think all it takes to play as a woman in women’s sports is to say you’re a woman then why can someone who does not identify as a woman play in women’s sports?