unless

I have many fond memories of newgrounds.

Source: (newgorunds.com)

Futurama’s series finale count is unprecedented.

OP is probably in the USA.

I bet if he were lighter green the bouncer would have let it slide

We really ate that shit up in the 90s eh

Not disputing, but would you be willing to elaborate?

But did they? Sub (forum) isn’t exclusive to reddit.

system broken

As workaround there is an alternative front-end that allows for this.

Phones do post processing in order to make up for physical constraints of their cameras. I find Samsung’s blurs fur a bit and gives it that distinct look.

Look into how YT started uploading shorts in low definition and upscaled them with AI, giving legitimate videos that look.

My stock camera app has built in automatic post processing and it’s never been good at fur

Same Type Attack Bon-- wait

“engagement” only impacts a a couple of the sorting algorithms (active, and??) available here.

Every part of a post can be edited. But I agree with OP in standing by it once others have brought it up

Edit: this place is unlike reddit in many ways but seeing the downvotes on your question I have to accept there’s more similarities than I would like.

Oh, and I guess it would be Active, Hot, and Scaled?

Everyone’s making jokes but if you’re serious they meant “stuttering”.

Edit: per vocabulary.com

If you’ve ever heard a young child stammer and trip over his words, you know what it means to stutter.

Use the verb stutter when someone gets stuck on certain word sounds, either because she’s speaking too quickly or eagerly, or because she has an actual speech disorder, also called a stutter. The word itself is somewhat onomatopoeic — a word that sounds like what it means — with its repeated t sounds. Stutter is thought to be related to the Middle Low German word stoten, “to knock or strike against,” which is the way a stutterer’s words sometimes sound.

Upbringing is the larger factor. Access to computers and technology at a younger age.

Took me a couple read throughs ngl but I see you’re referring to the submission’s editorialized (?) title.

Thank you for sharing your perspective. From mine I have never heard a good thing with regards to human rights from there. As a Canadian I want to emphasize we shouldn’t be complacent, we have a lot of work to do. But we can still recognise how far we have come.

In hindsight having “cult” in the publication’s name should have been a red flag.