But seriously what kind of predatory policy is that in the first place?

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    As an European, the “you can’t close your account too fast, this process is mandatory” thing would be a one way to a trial.

  • MBech@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I remember a few people complaining about being permanently banned from online games for lying in the in-game chat about being very young.

  • stinkytofuisgood@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is super clever. I cannot believe this never occurred to me, and I discovered it in a Lemmy ‘shitpost’ no less.

    Let’s keep up the memes and shitposts in this category!

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    its called “laxed regulation for dubious reasons”. happens all the time because government officials should probably wear F1 gear with all their sponsor logos slapped on them.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What country is “you can’t close your account unless you go 90 days without using it first” legal in?

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      This looks like a gambling app. So it’s not that you can’t close it until it’s not used. Voluntary exclusion is a mandatory policy required by legislation so a gambling addict can ask a casino to functionally ban them. This app is extra predatory in that they don’t allow a permanent ban right away. Their goal is to make it take multiple requests so an addict can relapse and spend more money and it’s the addicts fault.

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So the 24 hour and 90 day periods are different? Maybe it’s because of the LLM but they’re presented as the same thing.

        • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Ya, they’re sequential. So if you have a devastating loss you can’t just immediately delete your account, you need to cool down for 24hr before they’ll even let you request a full 90 day self exclusion. And finally only after that can you actually delete your account.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I can think of a lot of services.

      “We’ll deactivate your account but not fully close it. If you want to cancel closure log back in within 30 days.”

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If you’re an addict, gambling will prey on you.

    Also, OnlyFans will prey on you. Doordash will prey on you. Clash of Clans will prey on you. The stock market will prey on you. Your church will prey on you.

    You have two choices. Control yourself (only you can do it) or be a sucker

    • Emerald (she/her)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      How does onlyfans prey on you exactly? Perhaps for some people it does but I feel the porn addiction thing is pretty overblown. I don’t doubt some have it but the internet will have you think everyone who watches porn is an addict.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I think they’re referencing the app/engagement model.

        Being pornography is… tangential, sort of. But part of what makes OF and all those other services so addictive is the way they’re structured. Living on your phone, pinging you, targeted personalized offers, FOMO, and engineering the app to form parasocial relationships in particular.

        That’s different than randomly watching porn on the Internet, IMO.

        One other common factor is the “primal” addictiveness hook, e.g. gambling, food craving, or the draw of porn.

  • captcha@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I wonder how permanent closure is different from permanent lockout, but maybe it is similar enough in this case (I expect, they keep your data in the latter case)

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They would dump your data asap. They want no record that they illegally let a minor use their site.

        they’d keep it just to show that once they found out the account was a minor’s, they closed the account immediately. it’s proof of compliance.

        • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          But they certainly wouldn’t share that 12yo’s information with other companies to prove how good a company they are in shutting down a 12yo’s account, giving other companies all the information from the 12yo’s account to help the other companies better shut down future 12yo’s accounts.

          “We’re not sharing a 12 year old’s information. We’re passing on information on how to prevent us from sharing a 12 year old’s information in the future!”

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I started dipping into watching regular cable again since we have it at the moment bundled with our internet, and man the commercials are bleak now. It’s all weight loss medication, depression medication, and gambling apps.

        • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Have you tried Ozempic? Have you? Huh? You fat piece of shit!? Ozempic! Try it! Here’s a coupon for 50% off Ozempic. Have you tried it yet?

          Also, hurt in a crash? Call us! We’ll get you MILLIONS because you swerved to avoid that child in the street and hit a traffic light! We’ll sue that child’s family FOR YOU!

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Because by the nature of how human fats work - there is hardly a safe way to get rid of them without working out. This is why every weight loss drug has had serious side effects.

          GLP-1 is like the first one that’s supposedly safe for general public (hence the miracle), but we are already seeing lawsuits and what not from bad side effects, so might not be too big of a miracle after all.

          This is without even getting into the cardiovascular system and how this enables lazy lifestyle (instead of working out) that inevitably leads to early death for many

          • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Nothing is free, the difference between medicine and poison is dose.

            I would bet my life that there are unknown unfortunate side effects that a lot of people won’t like; time will reveal. There’s a race to sell all that they can now before those side effects are widely known

            I was interested in GLP-1 at one point, but after seeing the possible side effect of “hair loss”, I decided my hair was preferable to 20 lb. weight loss.

            • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Nothing is free, the difference between medicine and poison is dose.

              This.

              Fentanyl will fucking kill you with micro-grams of a dose spliced into that line you’re about to snort.

              It’ll also help your brain feel happy after you suffered a traumatic injury and you’re laying in a hospital.

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I honestly don’t even know how they work as they really aren’t common in Europe. That being said, US is positioned in quite a terrible place when it comes to nutritionism, so on average for every pound American eats, they get like 70% percent of the nutrients and vitamins as opposed to someone from UK for example. This means that if Americans start eating less simply because of GLP, malnutrition is going to spike. For many the daily food is so bad that for you to not be deficient, you will be obese.

              Looking online, the stats look worse than I remembered, so I’m not sure how accurate it is.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The programming is pretty fucking bleak, too. My elderly parents have cable TV and I try to watch it sometimes to entertain myself while I’m taking care of them, and I can’t find a fucking thing worth watching despite them having 500 channels or so. I always end up watching Beat Bobby Flay on the Food Channel and I can’t stand that fucking show.

      • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        Hahahaha yeah I’m there with you on the Beat Bobby Flay. I end up watching that or like Storage Wars, occasionally I’ll catch Wheel of Fortune and Jeopardy. But mostly it’s a lot of shit I wouldn’t have wanted to watch back when cable was the standard.

        And my viewing habits have just changed so much that even if something is on that I would watch, I already have access to it elsewhere so I’d rather not watch it on cable.

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Streaming plateforms are so bad that traditional TV doesn’t seems that catastrophic anymore.