The CEOs are not his audience, it’s the people watching and reading about this in the news.

Or they both turn their backs on him and start pooping and eating at the same time.

You’re winning an argument that no one is having with you, great job 👍

You didn’t respond to the substance of my comment. Links to paywalled articles are trivial to paste into a site like archive.is. Archive sites are taken down all the time, it makes no sense to provide them as the primary source of a link.

You didn’t really read or engage with any of my points, so I’ll ignore your lecture about misunderstanding.

Don’t put this on people posting links.

Use a browser extension if it’s personally important to you, or just paste the link in yourself. Archive sites go offline; they shouldn’t be primary link sources.

I would have upvoted this if it didn’t have a pointless tumblr caption on it.

How many people who post JS BAD memes could provide a single example of why it’s bad without looking it up?

The US left wing has a lot of great ideas and some really really terrible ones that are completely out of the mainstream.

That’s probably specific enough, right?

What a tremendous asshole. Did the American people not need to know it BEFORE Trump was indicted for it?

Replacement is just one application. What about generating entire performances? Can’t do it yet, but the data will be there when they figure it out.

The data is still going to be there when there’s cost effective AI tech…

• Dump on tl;drs
• Subject your readers to a minimally-edited 4000 word rant

You get to pick one.

Malicious custom emoji contained scripts that sent session cookies to the attackers.

And here’s where the mods turn to the camera with roguish smirks, because they weren’t necessarily bluffing.

You know, I’d love to read things that are written to be read, not something that reads like the storyboard to PCG’s video content for this item.

My cousin or my best friend or myself who might be gay or lesbian, any store they walk in they might get discriminated against because the Supreme Court says it’s OK

This is irresponsibly wrong, and I’m really surprised this is what you hear on a national network.

Breaking it down:

• The Supreme Court found that a Colorado law would violate the First Amendment as it’s currently written
• The law says that businesses cannot deny any service to members of a protected class based on their membership in that class
• The business owner in question offers services that involve creating expressive works (protected by 1A)
• The Court found that Colorado cannot prohibit the owner from refusing to create an expressive work with a message they disagree with.

Here’s what the Court did NOT find:

• Business can deny service to any person because they’re LGBTQA.
  • This was not the question before the court, and in fact the business owner in this case stipulated that she already does not deny service to anyone based on their membership in a protected group.
• Businesses can refuse to create an expressive work for any person because they’re LGBTQA
  • It’s not the fact that the person is gay, but that the message of the requested work is objectionable to the owner. Colorado cannot compel expression, per the Constitution.

And yet Van Jones is out here embarrassing himself and misinforming people who are LOOKING for a reason to be angry. Be angry about the facts, if you must be angry about anything.

Nope sorry, Youtube gets punished for bad ad practices. You don’t get to pretend that the content creator is the victim of the ad-blocking user when YT controls the platform.

Americans who understand the first amendment will tell you that freedom of association is inseparable from freedom of expression. The government (plus its agents) is the only entity constrained by the First Amendment. Everyone else benefits from it, including certain instance owners who don’t want to associate with certain others.

That is certainly one perspective.

We’re all affected by how our respective governments were born, and grew up, or didn’t, or haven’t had the chance to.

Now, I get it. No one wants to feel like they actually voted for the conservative outcomes

This is projection. Can you conceive of someone with slightly different political values than yourself?

A half-measure at best, and you know it, because as with everything they do, we only have bipartisan support if the wealthy get the lion’s share of the money. That’s how it was with Obamacare and COVID relief. It’s what they do.

This is how you debate? “I’m right because politician bad”? Cite a source or two.

That totally matters in a country where marriage policies exist mostly at the state level

lol, with the small exceptions of my own tax bill and federal benefits.

and the Supreme Court has already admitted they’re gunning for gay marriage next.

Right…in which case federal recognition becomes critically important.