I’ll disagree with most of this thread and say it somewhat does, because your views and biases are heavily influenced by your gender. So if genders are all the same, you’re just going to have a circlejerk. Is there something we should do about it? No, but I feel recognizing that it plays a big factor in a community is important.
I doubt it’d have anything malicious in the firmware. I’d be more concerned about getting ripped off with fake parts or having it break on you.
u can’t just ask that
Probably one of the most in-touch devs with their community and they’ve been super transparent and consistent throughout their entire early access journey. They basically showed how early access should be done in the best possible way. Been playing 1.0 for awhile but am a bit intimidated knowing I need to rebuild my trash ‘factories’ lol.
“allowed too” 🙄
Thx I’ll sell you it as an nft
Looks like that’s basically what’s happening now that I looked into it more. Like I believe the “hide” user button is the same (idk I haven’t been on the site forever lol), and the block basically blocks interaction but doesn’t hide it. Honestly makes sense because you could see the user who blocked you if you simply clicked a thread link in private browsing.
Like if you replied and blocked me on Lemmy, I could still open the thread in incognito or whatever and see the whole public thread but not reply to you. Seems actually reasonable tbh, since the blocker and block-ee doesn’t lose or gain anything they couldn’t already do already.
tcp
That’s the opposite of what’s happening. In this case, Musk would have blocked you, and you would want to see his posts (for some reason). You could normally see a user who’s blocked your posts by just opening the thread in an incognito tab to view as a logged out user. This just cuts out that step and lets you see the user’s posts without doing that.
That makes no sense. You can filter them out of your feed pretty easily, but they’ll still be able to interact with you and of course bring a lot of new toxic users to you. Your browser can’t do anything about that, it’s entirely Twitter’s side.
Ability to actually find interesting content. I want an algo, but at this point I want more of what Bluesky does but for Mastodon.
The ones who are most vulnerable to this change are the ones who especially should’ve left this platform already. I’m sorry, but they’re not being forced to use it, and everyone should leave it. I don’t have much sympathy or care about wanting to make an alt-right social media platform safer, I want it to crash and burn.
You’re desperately giving them the victim seeking mentality they crave
Let me know when the PC version gets announced, otherwise the product simply doesn’t exist for me.
Been waiting for them to get into mobile gaming. Hopefully they’ll force their mobile storefront to be less predatory. Maybe they’ve been waiting for when they could get a mobile/android game sold on their store to be playable on every other device, like how you expect with your purchases right now.
It’s a tool just like everything else, but people are just now sobering up after all the hype that it’s incredibly wrong a lot.
Still works for me
Why do people feel the need to police Mozilla so heavily when they’re nowhere close near the alternatives? It’s just toxic and disingenuous.
uh what are you even talking about?? It has block-buster console sellers like Concord