To repeat the exact point of your comment, you don’t know that the person you’re responding to actually thinks this or deserves this characterization.

Which is why I said “you may”. I didn’t claim that he does. But if he does, it’s okay to do so. However, most people appreciate some kind of validation. You seem to think that entertaining this characterization is “uncharitable”. This wasn’t my intention, quite the opposite.

And yet not a single response can be seen in this vein on comment after comment from the clear majority repeating over and over that the woman is protecting herself from bodily harm by speaking this way. Nobody seems to be telling them that they’re making assumptions. Only this guy gets this response.

Why didn’t you either?

In conclusion, as naive and simple as it sounds, let’s just be fucking nice to each other. Even to those you imagine deserve no respect or ‘special treatment’ (which is usually code for respect).

Internalizing that last bit is something I really wish more worked very hard to do. And it is very hard. I’m probably screwing it up here. But I’m trying. For what that’s worth.

Thank you, I can tell you’re trying.

You don’t know that anyone who responds this way actually thinks this. There are a limited amount of ways to communicate that they’re not interested and over-explaining and hedging their niceness would also just backfire. They gave exactly as much explanation as needed. It may come off a bit stiff because the tone is neutral (and they only use “I” sentences - speaking only what they know to be true instead of projecting with “you” sentences).

You may want more validation and that’s fine. But nobody owes it to you. You say “they just immediately assume I’m some kind of monster” - but you could be doing the same thing in assuming their motivations when they only speak neutrally.

No, do not give into Chromium. Letting Google dominate web rendering standards is a bigger problem.

Good for him!

How did I misread that? Sorry about that.

Actually the neighbor should have two boxes. They’ll be dead by avalanche of money very quickly.

I’m all for internet “dying”. Let it become a hostile environment filled with garbage and ads on the mainstream social media level. Hopefully people will get fed up with it and focus on real life again. Leave the dark corner of weird interfaces, console commands and modifications to nerds.

I will, soon. I just want to get certain gaming projects out of the way.

Oh you’re supposed to paint the whole thing. I thought it was just to get the smilies.

I love the idea but I hate how it revealed that my brain is deeply unhappy about not getting any kind of a confirmation for clearing a level. I feel blue balled and vaguely gaslit.

I’m just surprised that it seems relatively cheap. Not to me personally, mind you, but I would expect something like this that’s actually decent quality to cost somewhere more like 100k.

IP logging is only relevant if an user sticks to one instance. I (transparently) swapped from Sopuli to this one (because I like the domain name) and realized that it really doesn’t take a lot of effort to make an account on any instance one comes across. I looked at the ones that pop up in the All feed and I think like one of them had a requirement to link an pre-existing social media profile. Everything else was at most “tell us a little about yourself” which is a pretty insignificant hurdle. And ultimately, as you point out, there’s always VPNs. Which I suspect are actually even more popular than average on Lemmy as I think people here are inclined to be more techy. I also suspect increasing tracking would kinda go against the appeal of Lemmy in general. Furthermore, it may create the issue where the efforts to prevent malicious users makes the service more unappealing to regular users but doesn’t actually really prevent even slightly organized troll campaigns.

My opinion is that they should do away with voting entirely for one measure. It’s low-effort engagement that has been one of the biggest problems in modern social media. Active threads could be more about unique users posts and Hot just post amount (as Hot could easily be two people having an argument). If something is worth engaging with, ACTUALLY ENGAGE WITH IT. Comment, share your thoughts. Ask questions. Instance admins would still of course have to deal with malicious accounts but they’re easier to spot when they can’t just subtly manipulate content by votes. I know they can see who voted and how on any given post but that’s a few clicks away and they’d have to be somehow prompted to actually take a look. And then they’d have to investigate every account and try to figure out if they are actually legitimate users or malicious. Unless the user is in their instance, they can’t even see their votes on other posts directly. They’d have to coordinate with the user’s instance admin which I wouldn’t put a lot of faith in. Significant effort for a job that’s already pretty thankless. However, if the only engagement people can do is actually posting, that becomes easier. You can see user’s post history and 0-effort trolls stand out quickly. They also already should have rate limiting, which prevents users from creating new posts unnaturally fast (I imagine this is stricter on posts than votes).

It’s not that much of a problem YET, I don’t think. I browse by All - New because I use Opt-out protocol (blocking communities I’m not interested in) as opposed to Opt-in (Subbing, though I do sub to what I really care about). I’m not sure how many others do this but Lemmy moves slowly enough for this to be viable and it mostly neutralizes vote-manipulation for me personally. While I would like to see Lemmy gain traction, it would also mean my system would start breaking down, making sorting by active more appealing - which would bring back the issue of vote manipulation.

Edit: Oh and yeah, maybe at least remove Downvote option? My instance does. That would help a tiny bit.

Lemmy has severe problems with community integrity. The more traction it gains, the more you’re going to see spam, bots, vote manipulation etc. There’s very little it offers to mitigate that.

Persian Shield? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strobilanthes_dyeriana

I got one. Really pretty.

deleted by creator