Not sure if this is a reference to one of her songs or just an example of intrusive thoughts that people feel compelled to share on the internet.
People are so lucky for all the great knowledge that was lost when altavista bought dejanews and Google bought altavista. I saw stuff on early 90s usenet that was way way way worse than anything you can see on the modern internet.
I miss the old internet. Even the dirty underside.
When you have a medium of free expression full of weird people who don’t give a shit what the others think, you get the full spectrum of genius from the most horribly grotesque to the most inspiring beauty.
But when you start filling that space with people who think they should conform to what everyone else thinks, and worse, think that everyone else should conform to some behavior, you lose both ends of the spectrum and are left with relatively homogeneous monotony.
Reddit in a nutshell.
Will my comment on this post also be on the internet forever? In that case, I plead the fifth.
Saved
Dammit
“So, you said on social media that you hate this group of people…”
“Woah, that was like, 10 years ago.”
“Oh, so I take it those aren’t representative of your current views then?”
“… Lets not be too hasty.”
In link rot we trust.
The decline and data loss of MySpace was helpful for people in this regard.
Interesting timing for that ill fated migration. Just everything prior to GDPR regulations was lost.
Honesty we need to be more forgiving of people’s pasts. It’s not like people before phone cameras never got drunk at parties, it just didn’t get recorded and every employer thinks their employees are especially tight laced.
I think it’ll happen eventually, we’re just living in the unfortunate period where culture hasn’t evolved to the new environment yet.
I struggle with the concept of forgiveness and consequences. There isn’t an objective good. Someone who reforms can repeat the same mistake. There is no single state of existence that makes someone right or wrong at any given point. Sometimes, the difference isn’t in the person but the environment. Things like the golden rule seem flawed and overly simplistic.
I think there is an objective good. That goodness is Life itself. So long as we treat all Life with respect and try to live a life of balance, that makes us good. You are right though that this is still a very simplified view, and what it means to “live in balance” can depend on the situation or environment. But it’s a starting point at least.
As for forgiveness, it’s a choice. If someone makes an honest mistake, it should be easy to forgive them, as whatever harm they caused was not intentional. But if someone makes a wilful mistake, it will be harder to forgive them. And yet, because forgiveness is a choice, we can look at the reasons why someone acted in a manner that was harmful, and still decide to forgive them, especially if they repent.
As for consequences, those are results of our actions, whether intentional or unintentional. They are not strictly related to the concept of forgiveness, but generally speaking, we find it easy to forgive someone if their actions are harmless, or if the consequences don’t affect us personally. But if someone’s actions do affect us, we find it harder to forgive, regardless of whether something was an honest mistake or not. But the key to forgiveness, in my opinion, is that we need to look beyond the consequences and look beyond how we were personally affected. Forgiveness is a choice, and that choice is easier to make if our emotion is not muddied by consequence.
fake: there’s in-person job interviews (/s)
The opposite is true if you’re a nepo baby. See the entire GOP.
Ha the account avatar pic is exactly the same as the actual guy in the last panel.
Meanwhile, everybody wanting to be an amateur porn star on ph:
If showing your tits on the internet is going to stop those folks from being able to get jobs in their 30s, what are we going to do with them all? There’s a LOT of porn on the internet, like TONS.
